dChan
Anonymous ID: 5273e5 Aug. 9, 2020, 1:22 a.m. No.10230768   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10230756

look punk

" we are coming"

thats when you should use i

 

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii am at the FL / GA line

alone in my sign shop with a small dog

 

come over now,

just open the front gate

Anonymous ID: 5273e5 Aug. 9, 2020, 1:32 a.m. No.10230809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0811 >>0815

>>10230790

>present critical thought as argument

 

thats exactly what was presented to you

 

i did not criticizing the content

i criticized the grammatical style

 

you can not use so many I ME MY's when writing about a subject

 

nobody cares about YOU, it detracts from what you are trying to say

Anonymous ID: 5273e5 Aug. 9, 2020, 1:52 a.m. No.10230865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1008 >>1033

>>10230834

weaker

>>10230717

imma help you since it bothered you so much, but now we're done

 

an over-reliance on the first-person pronoun reflects a deep psychological distortion of the actual world. In essence, it is a product of fear: constant self-reference is like a verbal tic, a habit born of the stress and trauma that derives from coming of age in the modern world.

 

Why you should avoid the use of “I” in a paper

 

Writing a paper without using the first pronoun may not only make your paper livelier but also give the reader the need to complete your essay. Whether it is a personal situation you are writing about, Writing without it may have a number of advantages. They are”

 

You will understand your position– This will help the learners understand you are writing about yourself from your expressions.

Improves writing-Knowing how to avoid the use of “I” will boost the clarity of your work by forming clear sentences and phrases for your essay.

Improved thinking– This will improve your thinking capabilities as you will be thinking more about creating correct vocabulary, grammar and correct sentences without having a different impact on yourself.

 

there is nothing wrong, in principle, with using the first-person pronoun in writing. It is only when “I” feels redundant or superfluous that it becomes a stylistic flaw, and a first-person perspective is often central to meaning. That said, observation is far more effective at conveying subjective perceptions than is the confessional mode. To borrow a phrase from Ernest Hemingway, skilled writers create detailed psychological portraits by “put[ting] down what really happened in action.” In contrast, an over-reliance upon “I” statements can result in prose that feels weak, noncommittal, and egocentric.

 

Consider the difference between each of these paired statements:

 

Example A

 

I was told there would be cake.

She said there would be cake.

Example B

 

I woke to the alarm but immediately switched it off. As a result, I was fired for being late for work.

While the alarm could wake me, it could not prevent me from hitting the snooze button—a fateful decision, which cost me my job.

 

Example C

 

I think Twitter should suspend the president’s account.

The president’s Twitter account should be suspended.

In each example, both statements convey (more or less) equivalent meanings: cake is missing, folly reconsidered, censorship entertained. Yet in each case, the tone and emphasis are subtly shifted away from the speaker.

 

The first example becomes less diffident, more accusatory: it was she, that liar, who told me there would be cake. The second example builds narrative tension, as if to convey the speaker’s disbelief at having let events slip from her control: how could my alarm have failed to perform its duty? The third removes a redundant qualification: of course the president’s Twitter account should be suspended. This truth is self-evident, and need not be qualified; the fact that you think it, well, that’s implied by the fact of your assertion.