>problem is that those who scrape just the headlines make bakers scrape the whole effing thing to find out the 'story behind the headline'
>runs baker into the ground checking out 20+ headlines - and that's not laziness coz baker also has to check the date and whether previously notabled.
>better to have fewer posts with enough substantive info to judge the merits of the article wo/having to do most of the digging
Last (4-hour) bread had 32-34 notables.
Notes I made before seeing your post:
3 Portland violence could have been 1.
Intent of this post (from dailymail)?
>>10230650 Six people, including a pregnant woman, are shot after gunmen dressed in black stormed their barbecue in Philadelphia.
>>10230680, >>10230734, >>10230740 Erkin Sidick is a man that advocates for the people being abused and tortured. GRAPHIC TWITTER VIDEO of what the Chinese do. Stupid senationalist stereotyping racist crap - Thankfully, a few insightful comments busting it.
57e73b (19) (notetaker?) is an idiot cluttering the bread. What's his intention?
How many times in how many breads this story? >>10230759 Fake driver's licenses flooding into US from China, other countries, US says
>>10230760 This Is The First Photo Ever Of A Stealthy Black Hawk Helicopter So fucking what???
>>10230754, >>10230954 National Science Foundation - The janitor has been indicted on 3 counts of CP. So fucking what???
Like a tabloid made by stoned kids don't know the world beyond mommy's basement and their internetz.
Sunday edition.