>>10234343 pb
In case you're seeing this, this is my response from earlier:
>if man made the code then man can hack the code.
If.
>Digital currencies do not solve the crime problem.
I have no clue what you're talking about and I'd wager you had no clue what I was talking about.
>Still remember the bitcoin 'resets" and people losing their accounts and money.. so there is that.
Resets?... Are you talking about the halvening? I don't think you know what it is if you are. Secondly, people lose cash all of the time. You seriously need a bank to hold your funds for you? You even say at the end you miss personal banking... which indicates clearly that you haven't done hardly any research on this topic and just listen to what others say around you.
>Nothing like having cold hard cash when internet outages hit and power outages happen and natural disasters happen.
I'd never advocate a digital only economy and neither should you.
Diversification is important for plenty of reasons. I would hold physical and digital in virtually all circumstances. I'm not sure what the point of this line was.
Please, anon, it's necessary that you do your own research on this and stop trusting anyone with this topic.
Doing your own research is beyond imperative.
>>10234475 pb
I understand that there's justification for normies to be uneasy with this topic. Naturally, it saddens me that most of them still can't appreciate what people like me try to do.
Still, for anyone to wave me off when I'm trying to help calm the normies on this issue only makes me think people are doing this to scare them.