Anonymous ID: f08181 Aug. 10, 2020, 6:33 a.m. No.10241218   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anyone watching the Lightfoot speech notice that when the camera pans in she has a FuManChu mustache? Not even kidding, you can see the remnants of it.

Anonymous ID: f08181 Aug. 10, 2020, 6:36 a.m. No.10241235   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1239

Fox completely cut the Lightfoot speech once she began speaking about the looting being connected to a "shooting in Inglewood yesterday". The entire feed went black and picked up again after she was done speaking about it. This also happened two days ago during the WH Press Secretary Q/A when she was asked about the protests and riots and BLM.

 

Twice now in three days, twice same topic. WTF is going on here, I would think Fox would want that discussed.

Anonymous ID: f08181 Aug. 10, 2020, 6:59 a.m. No.10241375   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1388 >>1414 >>1427

Have you legit anons and Baker noticed that there has been a serious push over the past one and a half weeks to control the narrative of what "P" refers to? We already know one such shill is with the already exposed Matrix but they all are constantly spamming to push the narrative toward Payseur.

 

This tells me that "P" holds great value at this current point in information gathering and they want to keep us away from it as much as possible.

Anonymous ID: f08181 Aug. 10, 2020, 7:11 a.m. No.10241445   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1482

>>10241427

It appears the opposite as they all seem to want to direct anons toward Payseur and it happens so much that it becomes obvious it is a shill narrative. So this is why it made me suspicious and also curious as to what they could be trying to cover for because shills work to protect or hide something by inserting new narratives to shift eyes and consume time. What it means I do not know… yet

Anonymous ID: f08181 Aug. 10, 2020, 7:15 a.m. No.10241475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10241465

This is correct. I personally believe it is either Podesta or Pope from my own research but there are many theories and until Q throws a bigger bone on it we're at a stalemate of theory.