>>10242959 (LB)

Yeah I mean at this point I am probably one of the easier anons to identify due to how long winded and deeply explained my posts and research explanations tend to be. So you're right, there is absolutely a fingerprint left by the way we express ourselves and the manner we conduct our research while explaining it. At this point and after all this time I know when an anon who I consider a trusted source makes an investigatory post because I can see their investigatory patterns, how they conducted it, which websites they used, what phrases they searched for, and so on/so forth. The same goes for Bakers as I know when one of the good Bakers is on as they always do their job very well but the three best Bakers do it a bit different as two are much more talkative than the third. I am positive that when I post one of my investigative posts they see the same thing in my post and immediately connect that with previous important notables or mere posts.

We all leave a footprint in the way we interact with the world be it online or off. For those looking to learn how to do this or become better at it I would recommend starting with the shills as they are very simple to spot as they always use the same patterns which I will not go into as I don't want to intrude on anyone who is interested in learning how to examine and identify the patterns. But in their case they are (I assume) given a script and that script never changes and always manifests itself in the same way with how they make their post, the words they use, the capitalization, the red text/purple text used during specific phrases or words, and equally important how they deal with them being called out. It never changes and it never changes because, like I wrote, it's all a script which they are given on what to write and how to respond to (I assume) a series of various statements toward them. For example if they are accused of (BLAH) then they respond with (Choice B) and if they are accused of (GLAH) then they respond with (Choice F), it's all a script laid out beforehand for them. You will notice this even more if you give them an intelligent response because they have no ability to critically think for themselves and intelligent questions/statements are not covered by their handlers.

Bottom line and again, everything a person does leaves a trace, especially so when considering how we write, and most anons can see this immediately.

>>10243064

Clinton tends to often write things that are messages in a bottle. If communications have been severed then these people have to rely on coordination through messages within messages to convey plans or orders. This post by her may simply be a means to push their mail narrative to setup the claims of fraud for after he wins, readying the battlefield per se, but at the same time we have seen too many instances of coordination within Twitter posts which later turned out to seem connected.

So in this case I would look into if any major crimes happened on Friday (few days back) or consider it potential coordination for this upcoming Friday (August 14)

So today we have had explosion in Baltimore, Russia, and Britain. Over the past few days we have had them in Beirut, UAE, and China. Riots in America, Hong Kong, Belarus, Lebanon, Algeria, and Zimbabwe. I feel like there are riots in more places but the media makes it difficult to look up using the term "riot".

>>10243299

Yeah I am pretty sure it was on that friends account of Chandler, can't recall her name off the top of my head, something like Aboll or similar. She was the one who had connection to the royals in Britain, posted the photo of her on the plane sitting next to Fifty Cent and had all that other despicable shit on her page.

>>10243357

This also prevents independent journalists from getting in to report the truth which I think is what they are doing this for. This way they can control the information that comes in and out.

>>10243459

This is absolutely notablebaker.