you make shit up
I dont' make up fake bible quotes, no.
and if would do a search and find the real one and not say 'I might be wrong'
>https://biblehub.com/isaiah/57-1.htm
and you see it says nothing about 'letting children' 'die' or saying 'I let ' 'them die'.
the other was someone making up a bad idea and inserting it into scripture.
thank you for showing the real quote.
how hard could it be for the other one to do his own search.
you only say one thing that might be truthful in your one line put-down post
'don't know'
I assume you mean that 'you' are the one who does not know.
misquoting the Bible is a common tactic.
why is it stupid to point that out?
Oh, because you are a paid shill and I'm here telling people that your stuff is off and wrong and you are trying to put out subtle misinformation and lead pepole astray as if God would 'kill children'
Proverbs 26:9
New King James Version
"Like a thorn that goes into the hand of a drunkard Is a proverb in the mouth of fools." quoted from Biblehub.com
It's bad enough that things get misinterpreted, and then we have apologists who just make up fake quotes.
>10251107
this is an example of a shill who pretends to have insider informatin and just keeps steering the 'on the hook' anon off into father malignant gaslite paths of falseness and misleading implication.
your post asking me 'sauce' if your statement of made up conjecture is 'wrong' is sauce for you being wrong.
>baeb4d
example of something 'wrong' that is 'about' 'U'
showing an image of a girl with a shiner.
that's a low brow exploitative use a victim as a prop thing to do.
shall I continue.
>baeb4d
use of statistics and bold text
a sure sign of someone who has only wind to blow.
>baeb4d
over use of 'WWG1WGA' in red text
someone who is trying to hard.
more that is 'wrong' about 'U'
>baeb4d
dredgeing up 3 year old stuff that's been hashed over and posted already over and over again, and isn't relevant today
>baeb4d
uses 'kek' in a desparate attempt to sound like an anon not realizing that 'kek' is only said by bot scripts.
quotes Q with the hoax about 'clones' when 'they are related and in the same family' makes a lot more sense than saying that they are 'jarbabies'
but that is why this shill is angry at me because I dare to say 'this is also possible, and far more likely' but that doesn't go along with the 'they must be clones' hoax.
tries 'sum up ' what someone's 'thing' is as a lame put down.
continues with the personal attack.
seriously if you were on my team we wouldn't be friends. I'd assign you where you wouldn't cause problems.
I wouldn't wish you ill, like you do to me.
but I'd take you out of circulation.
I wouldn't pay you to post, which seems obvious.
and you wouldn't be involved in any policy decisions.
you'd maybe get a broom?
get asigned to load and unload trucks?
something where you opinions and nasty behaviors of dominant truculent gaslighting wouldn't be a problem.
no, anon.
I'm not a shill.
I'm defusing the shill assinged to this bread who is farming 'they are all clones' hoax to guilible people.
and the other one got nasty so I posted some analysis to show the idjit that I know what I'm doing and I know what he/she/it is doing.
(with an emphasis of the 'she-it' that he seems to like to put out).
so whatever, insert yourself.
this is a joke post in response to your joke post, it doesn't count in the 'scoring' being done by the other anon:
uses both 'kek' and 'fren'
does not use 'fren' as a way to reveal the fraud of it all as in 'Beach frenz' like during the Kav hearings, but instead tries to make it be 'friend' which everyone knows it isn't really.
but this post is, all in all just a subtle psytobic (myoptic?) humorist post.
effectively uses 'kek' in a way that is tasteful and doesn't seem to be psychophantic 'trying to fit in' mocking both me (who made a statement that this anon shows is not always true, sometimes 'kek' really is used effectively, and not just a moniker of someone trying to 'fit in') and the anon with whom I've been doing by robo-post anaolysis of his/shit/she's alternative methods of 'praise' for what seems to be bad conjecture easily explained by other conjecture that makes a lot more sense like 'they are rleatated to each other ' as opposed to 'they were grown in a jar'.
Kek spressively rubs anon's face in the fact that some use of 'kek' is effective comms of good-people.
as an exercise try two keyboards, on for each hand, and have them out extended at arms length and type like that. give us a report back here. It might help with back pain.
(obviously I'm only jokingly task-mastering, I don't really want you to do this and give us a report. It's not an assignment.)
shill-spotter says always choose the conjecture that makes you seem less crazy to what some call 'normies' as your baseline conjecture and most reasonable explanation of events, and keep the 'jar-baby' quality conjecture as an 'alternative' if the first one is shown not probable.
tiss better to be outside of the coocoo's nest.
being 'undiagnosised' by 'mental health professionals' is the better idea.
avoid the meaningless diagnosis that has the full force of law . . .
a useful observation: victims of governmental and institutional tyrannies are usually ones who self-report.
they are both humans
they may have common ancestors
your assumptions about 'race' are blocking you from seeing that people, genetically are more than 99.99% the same.
it's all good.
I think it's easy to get caught up in the conjecture.
I find nothing wrong with it.
one must understand, however, that it needs to be in a 'meta' because 'belief' is used to tag people.
bad people use the misuse of conjecture as an excuse to tag and 'trap' young whipper snapper minds who 'run off far afield' with it as a larp.
my point is that what we 'know' is often better to not share.
and encouraging that one would 'run wiht' the 'they be jar-chiles' narrative is . . . someone not conveying the fearful story of 'there are bad people who like to tag your thoughts as if they are 'monikers' of 'mental health'.
and that a prudent anon,
knowing how rotton institutions are
doesn't let a willful shill keep up wtih the svengallit 'yes yes, be the evil one for precious' bit that they do every friggin dragged out day.