>>10252282 You know, as much as I appreciate the effort you put into your posts… I am puzzled why you find it necessary to namefag.

What you are doing is nowhere near original, or clever. Avoiding filters does nothing to add to your credibility… and makes you look like a malignant newfag.

If you are too good to be anon, just pick a name we can filter, and get it over with. Or, make us ID filter your "special" ass… and remind us, every bread, that you consider yourself above the (time tested) etiquette developed by oldfags you can never hope to equal.

>>10252409 Right… because they have no way of knowing an idiot based on their "work".

Name/famefags have always been cancerous here, for reasons you clearly haven't the experience here to understand. It has nothing to do with IRL ID, and everything to do with ego.

It's clear why you're here… and, we're done.