>>10252557
who are the juries that look at each of these?
do they sit in a seat wihtout oversight of anyone moral and with ability to say that things have a taint that ain't going to wash with the public who see it all in full view.
they have to do the right thing and if not, they fail the test that all the eyes are putting on them right now.
they either lead, or they get put on the 'humm . . . why is that . . . why are they . . . ' list of doubt and people will disbelieve in the instituttions that harbor these who seem to be a festering brood to so many eyes.
we say 'how much longer do we endure these fools who make a pretense that they are not slaves to the cause of Justice. But it seems a revolt. They are in revolt.
they say 'we will not do what Justice demands, we will be a law all on our own, judicial over-piddlings as 'the law''
is they do say such (I havenot reported it) they would thus be in the 'now get out of the way' and would need to step down or . . . be made to leave.
take their resignations.