Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:05 a.m. No.10253149   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3193

how do they got so many whiners / valley chicks

 

couldn't be coincidental

 

They are creating fantasties for him to answer about

 

Trying to appear impartial

 

"governments integrity and judicial integrity is at stake"

 

yes, JUDGE SULLIVAN DOES LACK INTEGRITY

 

and it will all come out

 

but they are afraid of appearances

 

So sad, So bad.

 

IF YOU ARE AFRAID OF THE CONSEQUENCES DON'T DO THE DEEDS

 

now the bitch is choking on her words.

 

WHAT IS IT THAT WILL COME OUT

 

remember, fbi anon,

said the entire government is invoked.

 

ONLY THAT CAN EXPLAIN THESE JUDGES.

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:08 a.m. No.10253177   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3206 >>3215 >>3224

how do they got so many whiners / valley chicks

 

couldn't be coincidental

 

They are creating fantasties for him to answer about

 

Trying to appear impartial

 

"governments integrity and judicial integrity is at stake"

 

yes, JUDGE SULLIVAN DOES LACK INTEGRITY

 

and it will all come out

 

but they are afraid of appearances

 

So sad, So bad.

 

IF YOU ARE AFRAID OF THE CONSEQUENCES DON'T DO THE DEEDS

 

now the bitch is choking on her words.

 

WHAT IS IT THAT WILL COME OUT

 

remember, fbi anon,

said the entire government is invoked.

 

ONLY THAT CAN EXPLAIN THESE JUDGES.

 

GENDER CORRECT WILKINS

GOES BACK TO FANTASY WORLD

another sounds like a lady.

 

was he picked by obama too.

how many were picked by obama?

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:11 a.m. No.10253206   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3237

>>10253177

DoJ lawyer

finally made it straight, explaining the difference between their fantasies and reality

 

She 's really mad.

henderson?

Why would he dismiss.

If Sullivan were going to do the right thing, he would've done it already

 

claiming Sullivan is not making himself a party

millet?

This one is very scared.

 

you can hear her shaking with anger.

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:14 a.m. No.10253237   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3243

>>10253206

now claiming

can't make a decision in an vacuum

 

complaining that they can't call Barr

 

There are being disingenuous.

DELIBERATE

 

government can always plead the fifth

 

they want to be able to call the government before their Court

 

kekkkekke

 

Shes speaking with scorn

Why?

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:22 a.m. No.10253330   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3360

TATEL DAVID

 

more hypotheticals

 

"lets assume the rules are different"

 

trying to figure out how they can deny the motion

 

what happens then?

Theres nothing the goverment / flynn to do

 

Flynn would go to sentencing.

 

what would be the outcome?

 

the court appeals "There could beโ€ฆ."

What will happen in the end?

 

What is the purpose of going through this

 

?

 

They want to fact find, so they can over turn it.

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:25 a.m. No.10253360   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3375

>>10253330

"and the hypotheical is inevitable"

 

they will deny the judge the right to unilaterally jail Flynn? or sentence him

 

There are going to do the same thing they did with STONE

 

kekek.. not really funny, but they are so transparent

 

pile it on, he crossed us.

 

"we are not forecasting"

 

we want ot assure advisarial airing out .. so more can be laid out.|"

 

Sullivan has no questions. So why is he doing it?

 

She's choking when she says "circus"

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:35 a.m. No.10253458   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3462

>>10253435

more hypotheticals

 

high IQ idiots

 

can a Court impell the Governemtn to bring a case?

 

answer

by the communist

 

yes, you can. if it's in "public interest"

 

Why pick Gleason, who is a partisan?

 

looking for adversary

 

appointed not to be neutral

 

she choking up again

THESE PEOPLE

must really be on the hot seat, to get this show of bias.

 

What's on these people?

There's probable cause to impeach them

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:41 a.m. No.10253510   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3535 >>3585

>>10253471

what is the right that has been denied.

 

SULLIVAN has a right to deny order of DoJ?

 

They are trying for any thread of possibility to do what they've already made up their mind to do?

 

They claim judge has the right to sentence Flynn after the DoJ said to dismiss.

 

Then they say

well they can appeal

 

guess where it appeals to?

right to their same fucking court

 

yes you are gargling.

They are all choking

 

They are holding that the judge has the right by a rule,, he gets to rule, because of a law that says he can.

 

its a regulation.

 

"judge sullivan is stellar. been around for ever. no sense he would do the wrong thing."

 

total liars.

can they be in trouble for knowingly lying to the Court?

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:47 a.m. No.10253564   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3605

>>10253543

let's pretend

 

more hypotheticals

 

at least they show their rackets.

 

They do the same rackets over and over.

Must be hypothetical / fantasies are in their tool box

 

They use "narration"

This was what Barr talked about in his interview with levy

 

one of the females is playing the devil's advocate to get them to order that it happens fast .

"is it right?"

 

they are claiming he is not in custody.

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 9:52 a.m. No.10253605   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10253564

"never been a case for irreparably harm"

 

They've been cheating for no long.

 

We have no rule that the Court has to rule

 

swiftly

 

so they want to hobble Flynn for as long as possible

 

Guess it is already settled how they plan to rule

 

oh course the Court can't deny the public interest.. issues.

 

however all the public interest goes against framing an innocent man

 

At the very least it's a poor precedent; and at the same time proves the judiciary corrupt and unreliable

 

"it will open the flood gates"

 

really ? does DoJ dismiss a case for prosecutorial mis behavior routinely?

 

They claim he is a "respondent"

 

"seconded guessing prosecutor"

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 10 a.m. No.10253666   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3676 >>3682

>>10253323

"we're not bad judges"

"sullivan's just going to do what is right anyway"

"but give him a chance"

 

They have no questions.

so why do it

 

she's choking again!

 

now they are doing the "hypothical" again

what if sullivan just does what is good.

 

? They only been trying to frame Flynn for three years.

Why would anyone doubt our good faith in denying mandamus?

 

we presume they do the right thing. but is there something that suggests totally impropter conduct

 

but of course we have no evidence ot that

 

just like the mirage predicate that started this whole thing.

 

So that means the judges are "obstructing justice"

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 10:05 a.m. No.10253699   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

ROGERS

 

no basis to take Sullivan off the case.

 

they don't get it

So used to corrupt proscutions.

 

Have often have they railroaded the innocent?

 

Sullivan will follow what we say.

 

they are not planning any instructions to Sullivan?

 

Concerns are all speculative?

 

They are colluding.

Why would they admonish the judge or give him any guidelines?

 

no instruction to "follow the law" ?

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 10:10 a.m. No.10253747   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3756

we need to follow up on briefings.

 

There will be more data coming in.

 

Therefor its a unilateral trial of Flynn by the judiciary

 

Claiming it will be nothing.|

smaller?

They plan fact finding.

 

potus might stop this before it gets to the Supreme?

Would n't want Supreme creating bad communist law

 

"in the interests of the people we will punish Flynn as we care to"

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 10:19 a.m. No.10253822   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10253780

why are the judges arguing the case?

 

The judges have made themselves parties

 

What is the blackmail on them?

 

We need some FOIA act and more docs to find out why they are so biased.

 

Aren't they supposed to be impartial?

#stopthebias

 

judges trying to take over the country with ANTIFA

 

sept 9 will come back.

 

What will happen between then and now?

 

Wow. At least they showed their colors. That was cool.

Anonymous ID: 92194a Aug. 11, 2020, 10:21 a.m. No.10253844   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10253824

they go, think, write,

and then come back with their papers and issue their decision

 

we have til the ninth to make a petitioning, as best we can.

 

We don't do ruckus, as they do

They have a lack of argument so their supporters have to do "RUCKUS"