Chicago criminal video tapes himself breaking into an ATM machine:
https://twitter.com/mymixtapez/status/1293210958039580672
I agree that anyone/everyone involved should go down, period. That being said, every single thing that has been presented about Donald Trump in regards to the island, Maxwell, Epstein, everything has amounted to pictures of him through various years. There has never been any viable allegations with evidence and, in fact, even the girls who testified have stated under oath that he never acted in the same manner as the others and was never seen on the island.
So at this point there is simply nothing to tie to the POTUS to any of it outside of taking a few pictures with some people who had involvement which is something Trump is pretty much famous for in regards to taking pictures and being on good terms with everybody regardless of political party, country, etc.
Contrary to what unintelligent and highly suspicious individuals such as Mike Rothschild and Ben Collins do their best to claim this is primarily a research site no different than any other cold case or investigatory site on the internet with an emphasis on compelling and factual data. Have there been theories and speculation? Of course but they always come with at least a low level of material that points to a need to dig into them such as certain types of connections between people, history of issue, and so on. What you are trying to push is basically like saying: "This man/woman took a picture with this person so they must be involved". That completely goes against the normal methods of research conducted not just here but in any walk of life where people are seeking facts and not fictions.
If Trump is later proven involved I will be the first person in line to dig into that issue but after all this time researching at a very high level and giving no special treatment to anyone/any group I have never seen a single piece of damning material on Donald Trump, not one. All I have ever seen is allegations galore, repetitive attempts to create a false narrative, and a very obvious attempt to control the flow of information by either painting a completely incorrect picture about what legitimate anons do here or inserting a situation for their benefit to allow them to paint said picture very similar to how the FISA warrants were approved.
All of the real anons here tend to focus on very specific investigations which tend to intersect with each other so you will never see a real one drop a post like you just did, ever. I put my primary investigative direction on hold this morning to look into these recent odd articles popping up and I believe I have evidence to connect several well known "journalists" to coordination and working together to use very specific social media accounts to insert them into this issue only to later use to write their articles. In fact it has nothing to do with "believe" at this point as I know I have the evidence and am compiling it now for night shift drop which will massively expose the four along with Fireside Campaigns & The Center for Secure and Modern Elections.
Granted it should be a notable (and has been a few times over the past few days) but, honestly, things like this are just an eye roll situation to me. So we have a guy who fucked women he worked with and who sent him nudes, seriously who cares, unless there is a claim of sexual assault. I just find it somewhat humorous that these women act like complete skanks, send these pictures to some guy they decided to jump into bed with, and then later become shocked and offended that the photos they sent are somehow either left on a computer or hacked or whatever.
Stop sending the pictures you dumb women and stop shitting where you eat you dumb man. That solves the issue. This reeks of "give me money" as they typically always do. I honestly don't see how a young man can positively look for a partner now a days with these types of women given free passes to act any way they wish only for the man to be destroyed later for it. I feel bad for you young men who have to navigate these women, I truly do.
No actual Marine describes him/herself in the manner you just wrote, literally none, so before you play make believe you might want to look into the lingo that actual Marines use less you expose yourself before you even begin your attempted con.
Okay, now I follow. I always referred to them in a different phrase but now I see what you meant as we covered this fairly extensively a few years back. I just have never heard of the phrase "jar baby" before so it made me curious.
This is exactly correct and many of us have been saying it a long time now. Notice the three that are always cited by the fraud "journalists" are either Matrix, Majestic, or "E"? That was one thing I definitely noticed earlier which was the reason I even bothered to look deeper into those connections this morning. But as I and several other anons have always said:
"Twitter would never allow such information to be discussed so any and every single account that is allowed to do it is allowed for a reason"
I mean seriously the mere fact that the page is often bombarded with those three trying to push people to the site while, at the same time, the same fraud journalists are writing articles to discredit the research while using those exact accounts as evidence that the research is trash should tell everybody what they need to know and if it doesn't then they aren't intelligent enough to research these issues anyhow. This is why every single anon should add any and every single person who posts anything to do with those accounts to their auto filter list much like the spammers who always leave the same messages at every bread start. Notice that the fraud journalists also use those spam messages to claim the site hates Jews? They always cite the same spammers or same accounts which are allowed to survive on social media despite all the real accounts being zapped. You will never once see a single one of those so called journalists ever show up here and directly ask questions to any of the anons who are posting intelligent or compelling statements, never will that happen, never, not once. It's all a ploy to limit the true information from spreading by setting up accounts to post, be allowed on social media, and expand so they can later claim the research is baloney.
I would think that America has undercover assets/agents or SpecOps active in every single country on the planet with no exceptions. The African continent though, yeah, I think it is very safe to assume that as being true given how the Chinese are literally killing off/displacing locals and colonizing many parts of Africa while also training up some locals for both insertion into western countries through their funded BLM movement or indoctrination to later use as a force during the conflict in Africa which is the very likely start point of WW3 in my opinion.
Anons, do you recall my post yesterday about the gold outline which myself and six other legitimate anons also had? If any of you anons are here now that tweet by the POTUS may have something for us considering how out of place both the gold outline and his use of gold in that statement is.
Rather odd that Garcetti would be working with the VP vetting team. You would think that Biden would have that fully covered in a real campaign as that is something that would be immediately covered during the hiring process (I would assume).
You know what, I think you may be right anon. I recall many very odd posts about dogs in the past from celebs and high ranking DNC types. Keith Oberman comes to mind.
You are right, thank you.