>>10271443
>>10271451
no and no.
When engineers/experts see how it can be done, they will be fucking angry. It is astonishingly simple. It will reveal how engineering education has been warped to prevent people from figuring it out. Much of what experts in the relevant fields believe is false as a result, but not in the hyped up way the new energy fags try to get people to believe. It makes so much sense you can't help but laugh. Hard.
However, no free beer today.
I have good reasons to stay mum. I'm quite sure there are others who have figured it out. Perhaps even more ways to do it. It'll happen.
>>10271466
Watch for DIY circuit board fabrication releases in the maker/hobbiest community. Make your own. There will be more DIY tech that I believe can reshape the meaning of how computers fit into peoples' lives.
Software alone cannot fix this. It has to include hardware and some philisophical changes to how people perceive transparency and security. People need to be taught to not accept certain parts that are not open source, but other parts can be closed source without compromising security. This enables strong competition (trade secrets) without allowing the door to surveillance/malware.