Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.10280509   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0553

>>10280450

>the shills

The people here from the beginning whose goodwill you're trying to spin onto yourself for future acknowledgement?

"Look guys, I was there!" (Three years late, contributing nothing)

I get it, dude; your ego salivates at seeing yourself as something in the future–to have people you know associate a persona you posted nothing of use under as a bastion of all the work that went down here.

You want them to know you were "there", and you want to prove it, without admitting to yourself it is so and just posting with your real name for people to fag over.

This isn't the place for your ego. Nameless, faceless. Not that you know why that's asked of you…

Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:19 p.m. No.10280520   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10280463

Admittidly.

There's a difference between getting the word out and famefaggingstealingfor your own ends, no matter how much someone claims to be doing it "for the children".

If that's the case, validating and inserting your own name over the purpose is…actually reprehensible now that I think about it.

Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:26 p.m. No.10280581   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0588 >>0599

>>10280527

>But You're saying … No

No: if the famefag was actually contributing, they'd be posting it under the namefag they've chosen–they wouldn't let that attention pass them by.

(I miss McThistle. Fuck, I even miss Toots at this point)

Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.10280591   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10280534

Not what's being said: we're talking of a certain breed who see themselves above the purpose, and therefore jeopardises the purpose, because their ego will always come first.

Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:30 p.m. No.10280619   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10280578

Likewise, Einstein, if you could copyright research lines/threads/connections and their discovery, the way one would a virus, a genome etc., I guarantee there'd be a lot of Twatter fags on the end of litigious motherfuckers.

Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.10280649   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10280588

Funnily enough, I was the one who got 'em to stop that, too.

Then called her (yes, it was a chick; she genderfagged passingly) out when she used the identifying picture but just removed the name.

But, I respected McT. Even sympathized with my (You) from Q and the "famefag" aspect if it were to be posted.

Anonymous ID: 31bc06 Aug. 13, 2020, 7:35 p.m. No.10280673   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10280553

>YEAH AMERICAN EGO

Wrong, retard.

(YOU) AIN'T BEEN HERE LONG HAVE (YOU)

Long enough to be able to prove I was here day 2 and wa-a-a-a-a-a-y long enough and attentive enough to know you, kek, deffintley fucking weren't.

(Forgot to respond to you, famefag, had to come back. Sorry)