It's cool, anon; more normies will come here and start famefagging because that's "how we do", and the board will only improve from there.
Seriously, though, if even Q telling you not to namefag doesn't do it for you, you really are lost. Reddit is that-a-way.
(Any actual defence from one of you namefag groupies yet? Just validate the need. We're autists: we're smart, we'll get it, if your reason is valid)
And "self-important", you dolt: I'm not the one insisting of namefagging myself.
Oh, you fucking normies. I'd kek if it weren't so sad…
Lel. Still zero validation for the namefagging from any of you.
Forgive me, anon; this place just gets worse the more the normies insert their ways here.
There was a time…
>Everything you say just further proves my point
Hardly. Again, from any of you defending the famefagging, just, "how", "why". Shall we get Karen in–not that you're not already here defending your namefag son, sweetheart.
And if it's "self-important" to call out someone trying to make themselves famous on here of all places, busted. You got me. And you're clearly more retarded than you're letting on.
(As if you've never used the word "normies", as well. Kek, anon. Very kek)
And "dime a dozen". If only…
Aye. Last thing we need is more people thinking seeking fame here is what we're about because once they start, they're not gonna stop.
I fought the "notables" war, I'll stand here, too.
Actually, you're just making the shills work easier: they know you'll bend over like a good little groupie.
Don't mistake "triggered" for fighting against the I.Q. obliterating intellect you bring here.
(Again, still waiting for that defence of the namefag. It'd be good if you could "trigger" that)
Still, no defence.
I'm going to hear "your" pronouns before any valid thought regarding the rest of the world, I can tell…
You nigga's haven't even read the drops.
Fuck me: this place really has gone to shit.
And I'm still waiting on that defence of the namefagging from any of you groupies, but we all know it isn't coming, 'cos you've not got it.
>ANONS ARE NAMELESS, FACELESS
>Q
Agreed.
When weand if weneed to namefag individually, God will make us known to the world, personally, I promise, not us taking it ourselves.
Don't give the famefag that much credit, anon; it's just someone trying to build their ego for acknowledgement.
Embarrassed for you, bro.
I love that's the line you worked out and you're sticking to it.
Still waiting for one of you to defend the famefagging or tell Q why he was wrong about famefagging.
I don't think Q was wrong, I'm with Q on being nameless, fameless, faceless all the way.
Doesn't take a genius to see why being a vacuous groupie at this scale is a terrible idea, but even if I couldn't see it, I'd probably acquiesce on this one thing.
Only famefags we need are Q and the Trump admin, and they deserve it; fame gives them protection above many other things.
Didn't say "let them take over, consume and namefag to the point the Q op is the Karen op, the Collin op, the D-I-Y personality op", though we are abundant in their type, both in name and nature, already.
I welcome normies, but don't forget the old addage, "learn the culture". Unless that was before your time? Not been said in a while which speaks volumes…
You gave no answer, faggot, don't try and spin it like you did.
I actually read until you said "old school one".
Still waiting for the defence of namefag's.
>kisses groupie ass so they keep kissing his
Actually, fucknut, any "doing" you think you've done is because you've been defending something an "old school one" would have seen the issue with.
But you chose to engage the other side, which leads to discord.
Don't congrat yourself on being a good troll; you're a shit anon thinking he's smart for taking the opposing stance to a "ree" you 'tard.
This has actually amused me.
Your logic regarding your "ability", I mean.
And posting an "anonymous" related image with your post gains gait when people scroll by and assume it's one of "those posts", nothing of worth, though.
One of the few who actually reads the drops which is 4-6% seeing as how you'd never read the "nameless, fameless, faceless" drop.
I get it more than you ever will, lil' Piggy.
With the asshole feeding his ego with his hand up a cats' ass, actually.
Which would be (You), namefag :)
But I'm sure Q thinks you should be the exception.
I can already see your mind working: you're going to take your groupies line and insist you've been trolling for months.
Just, ahead of time, drop that idea: nobody's falling for it.
Despite your insistence to make this all about you, yes. And the following was in regards to your thought pattern this evening–we both know you aren't quick enough to implement that in one night.
Got some brown on your nose there, anon…
>"Guys, we can't defend the namefagging, what do?"
>12 minds in one room, best they can come up with is downplaying your namefag fren and your top-groupie status.
Kekekekekekek.
No, you've read what a newfag/shill said weeks backand was corrected by manyand are postulating that as the correct timeline.
It just isn't.
>latter portion of the Toots era
Anon, I can't even…
I read drops.
And I'm not trying to give myself an inflated sense of importance by treating myself like a celebrity.
Oh, Piggy. I would have considered you a misguided anon but you can't even try and defend why you're disrespecting the entire op.
I understand why you'd deflect for so long, but now you're spitting in Q's face.
Oh, please, please, tell me you've not just grabbed a Toots post for a legit Q…