>>10286069 (lb)
NOICE, anon.
Trying to catch up, but unless she asked @POTUS, specifically "Who is Q?" or "Does this Qanon work directly for you, sir?", then whatever question was asked isn't the right question.
BUT THE MSM COULD TOTALLY FUCK THE MOVEMENT IF THEY SIMPLY ASKED
BUT THEY ARE TOO STUPID TO FIGURE THIS SHIT OUT, AREN'T THEY?
Just heard it. She fucking tried, didn't she?
It will happen at some point near the election depending on how quickly things escalate from Clinesmith's plea.
Yes, he did sidestep addressing Q directly by fully endorsing the candidate, and then ending his response with "Absolutely". He did NOT start his reply with "Absolutely". Also, the reporter did try to follow up with "Do you think Qanon is worth looking in to" to which he completely sidestepped and moved on to taking other questions.
Anons get it. Others will run with it in the opposite direction. Always best to temper emotions with facts. The show goes on.
He can't confirm it right now because "muh election interferences". That's why I keep goading the MSM to ask, over and over again. It'll drive them all absolutely batshit insane, and he'll be forced to stop giving the MSM so many opportunities to ask stupid questions. This is going to be fun to watch, anons. Get your senses of humor ready.