Anonymous ID: f87805 Aug. 14, 2020, 11 a.m. No.10286482   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6491 >>6518

>>10286420

I agree.

 

It would not be a good idea to answer the Q THE VERY FIRST TIME Q IS MENTIONED TO HIM, especially when the question is framed as a 'conspiracy theory'.

 

POTUS SHOULD NOT HAVE AND GOOD ON HIM FOR NOT GIVING THAT LADY THE HONOR.

 

GIVE IT TO OAN!

Anonymous ID: f87805 Aug. 14, 2020, 11:03 a.m. No.10286549   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6565

>>10286491

 

If I were POTUS, there is no way I would give that puppet WHCA presstitute the honor of 'nudge nudge wink wink' confirming Q.

 

I would wait for the question to be asked respectfully, with tact, and from someone who deserves to be the first reporter ever to be the one to have the question answered.

 

Q+ has worked FAR too much and given FAR too much to give the honor to a fake news Muppet.

Anonymous ID: f87805 Aug. 14, 2020, 11:15 a.m. No.10286708   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10286669

That is not a source.

"consensus" without source can be used to justify ANY claim.

 

I've been POSTING since Oct 2017, Q'd three times, and what you are saying HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR ALL ANONS.

 

TRY HARDER

 

YOUR OPINION ON THE FORM OF THE Q REQUIRES POTUS TO VIOLATE NATSEC WITH TRUE ANSWER.