@TheLastRefuge2. He's a larping larper just like E the Larp.
>Gateway Pundit
Also, this anon isn't afraid to point out that GW Pundit isn't always right about some of the stuff they post, and if they are endorsing LARPs, that should give anons pause when referencing their news articles. Juuuuust sayin'.
Good; at least they didn't do it themselves. And what I was referring to about their accuracy was when Jim Hoft posted an article about "Huber didn't do shit". I had to take to twitter to let him know he was wrong, and that Huber's investigation was subsumed into Durham's.
Even "Time" magazine got that one right.
Gateway Pundit article:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/it-was-all-a-head-fake-clinton-foundation-whistleblowers-say-huber-lost-their-evidence-had-to-send-it-3-times-huber-never-even-looked-at-it-and-now-the-probe-is-over/
Time Magazine article:
https://time.com/5693083/john-durham-justice-department-investigation/
A separate investigation by the U.S. Attorney in Utah, John Huber, which had been examining the FBI’s surveillance of Page, and other FBI conduct, has been “subsumed” into Durham’s, according to the Justice Department official.
>Too bad TGP no longer allows links, memes and twatter posts; that could be a sign as well
I didn't know that about them. So they aren't fans of discourse, huh? That's interesting.
Not sure why baker didn't include it in notables, but:
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/10286057.html#10286460
Watch the vid. @POTUS was asked about the GA candidate that follows Q. @POTUS didn't answer the reporter about the Q part of it, but did fully endorse the candidate. Then ended with "Absolutely" (so as to make it seem like he endorses the Q thing, sort of).
The reporter then tried to ask a follow up, more directly, about Q. @POTUS side-stepped and went on to other reporters' questions.
Here's the reporter that asked about it. Go show her some love/appreciation:
https://twitter.com/colvinj