Anonymous ID: ba9096 Aug. 14, 2020, 2:28 p.m. No.10289038   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun

Followup on digg request in past bread re: Potomac Foundation:

 

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1008757/pg1

(full text too long to post, but good)

 

So a few days ago I read this article in the New York Times:

 

 

WASHINGTON ā€” Ukraineā€™s military has an urgent need for nonlethal military assistance like body armor, night-vision goggles, communications gear and aviation fuel to defend against a potential Russian attack, according to a new analysis by a former NATO commander and a former Pentagon official.

 

But wary of provoking Russia, the Obama administration has been reluctant to provide it, they say.

 

ā€œImplementation of U.S. nonlethal military aid is seriously flawed and needs immediate correction,ā€ Gen. Wesley K. Clark and Phillip A. Karber wrote in a copy of the report that The New York Times obtained on Tuesday. General Clark, who is retired, is the former NATO commander who led the allianceā€™s forces during the 1998 Kosovo conflict, and Mr. Karber is a former strategy adviser to Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger.

 

[ā€¦]

 

The visit of General Clark, who ran for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination, and Mr. Karber took place in late March and early April. They traveled at the invitation of Ukrainian officials, and the trip was paid for by the Potomac Foundation, an American nonprofit research center.

 

 

The article and the accompanying report/assessment (which you can read here) alone are interesting, but what really caught my attention was this "Potomac Foundation". I had never heard of them. According to the article, they're just "an American nonprofit research center". The report has a bit more detail, statingā€¦

 

 

With travel costs covered by the non-Ā­profit Potomac Foundation (an organization with a long history of supporting East European and former Soviet Republic training for NATO membership), Clark and Karber traveled to Ukraine to undertake a joint militarily oriented, nonĀ­public assessment, and do so on a nonā€partisan basis.

 

 

So I was curious and decided to look into the Foundation, to see what they do. What I found (or didn't, rather) answered none of my questions and raised even more. This group is a ghost.

I'm convinced that we're dealing with a shadow CFR-like think tank.

 

(cont'd in link)