>>10292925

Typically I would not only agree with that but would be the first in line to tell someone to STFU for even suggesting it. But at this moment the entire social media landscape is fixated upon that one video and linking it to this very research. In other words it is overshadowing (no pun intended) everything else. Now it may very well be legitimate. I am not sold but I am also a nobody and don't have any type of secret knowledge so all I can do is go by logic and my own research.

But what I do know and what I can see is it appears that video is now the springboard being pushed so if it is meant to be then I expect QAnon will stay quiet as they would have no reason to cite it. If it isn't then I expect they will reinforce previous posts about those people.

This is purely speculation on my part based off of all these years and the patterns that Q tends to follow when "big" events happen. I could be totally wrong though. But with all these conflicting parties going head to head over the issue it seems more like a means to cause confusion on its face but at the same time the information from it appears genuine so it's difficult to know which is the correct landing point. Especially when I consider it being from Millie and Gavin who have a long history of complete baloney. So while I have never asked/never would ask QAnon to weigh in on an issue I would actually, how do I put this, I would appreciate it if they did as it would sort things out. Granted I doubt that happens as, like I wrote, who the fuck am I to matter enough to want that but all I am saying is given the current situation and the gravity of all this, I think it would be smart to do so before the media seizes the chance to create the narrative if it IS a bad video. If it isn't then ignore my statement.

>>10293031

Always loved the Pumpkins, my favorite band, BK has always been based and always had no problem exposing issues.

>>10293149

What they covered was not a military operation but a CIA connected operation through civilian vendors who had a ton of ex military, fed, foreign agent (MI6) and so on. From how I understand the video (could be wrong), the DOD contracted a company to create this "ShadowNet" for military application and the company who created it ended up patenting it, keeping it, and then using it thereafter.

At the same time the NSA had a similar program. From there things get a bit dicey as they brought up, but never explained, that the powers that be didn't want Hillary to win and wanted Trump to win but wanted to remove him after he won. But at the same time it was confusing because the video also mentioned how they didn't want Trump to win either. So it (appears) to be saying conflicting things as it definitely mentioned it didn't want HRC to win and it definitely mentioned it didn't want Trump to win but it then claimed it wanted to let Trump win to set him up after due to his looking into Ukraine.

Now this is one of the video points that actually began to strike me as potentially legitimate as we all know the reaction to Ukraine and I must also add that we were warned about Ukraine long before Q even became a thing as FBIAnon was hellbent on people looking at Ukraine as he/she claimed it had great significance to Soros, HRC, global issues, and so on. We have never truly been able to put all that together and have only landed on a lot of speculation but I think all legitimate anons would agree Ukraine was a place where a lot was going on.

The video also mentions (the Tore lady) that she "knows exactly what happened to Seth Rich" which I found suspicious given that if that were true she would either be dead or infront of a damn Grand Jury immediately. There is more but still digesting. A lot of it are things we have long already discussed but the big "addition" (if true) was the introduction of the who, and the what behind many of these things which I do not have a conclusion about as they didn't offer any evidence, hard evidence that is to say. I am not going to write it off but I am also not going to blindly trust it, especially given the background of Wince and Millie. The guy (old guy) Bergy came off as legit and the woman (Tore) seemed to know their shit but it could all be an act. I did however notice Tore just got her Twitter zapped.

I just don't know. Need more before I conclude and even then, just don't know. I am getting a lot of memories and old feelings from FBIAnon drops right now.

>>10293341

Adam Housley is very much legitimate. I won't go into why I think that as it would dox me but that is a guy who has suffered a lot and the Housley's are absolutely reliable as far as sources go. Thanks for that post anon, I had forgotten to check his feed.

>>10293331

Let's also not overlook this. The guy is a literal traitor.

>>10293372

This is what I think they are going to nail Weaver for, as well as Jack Posobiec as well. I have long wondered if Posobeic has always been the source of the breaches:

https://www.militarytimes.com/2017/08/17/navy-strips-security-clearance-from-officer-who-tweeted-about-charlottesville/

Given what we now know from this video, if it is real, he would have been a perfect asset for a company to grab intel for their creation of their shadownet. Yet another Info Wars connected type as well.

So we have Jones who was basically censored and banned from every major social media company. We have JP who had his clearance revoked while working as a Naval reservist. We have Millie Weaver who had that shit today. Is IW/was IW a total data theft and harvest company masked as a news source? If memory serves there were more than those three as well. It's just weird that it keeps going back to them time and time again.