Seems to be UK related:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/21/enacted
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-parental-consent/fact-check-children-cannot-be-taken-away-and-detained-without-parental-consent-under-the-coronavirus-act-idUSKCN25A21F
It's Reuters, so not a 'UK' fact check as such, anon.
Whilst Fact Checks can be suspect, it does quote a government official, and I'll have to take that over an un-sauced FB fearmongering copypasta at this point.
The point of my post was to give some (possible) context to a notabled, un-sauced FB copypasta…
I'm not unaware, anon. Doesn't mean all their fact checks are necessarily false. Snopes for example, usually word theirs in such a way as to avoid the issue. And that's a separate argument to un-sauced FB copy pasta.
I provided two sources, including the relevant act - feel free to tear apart the act vs random, un-sauced FB copypasta….
>Those were dates Q used to build interest, but which turned out to be disinfo
Sauce please