>muh profile pic looks just like me I swear
Just how trustworthy can a fatty that's already lying before she opens her mouth be?
>Did you find something in the video that was so fantastical it couldn't be true?
What kind of standard is that?
I can make any statement that sounds realistic.
Doesn't make it true.
The more direct answer, tho, is the interviews Millie did with those two main "former" spooks sound cardboard af.
Lots of leading questions and insinuating answers, but very little substantive sauce just trust me I seen't it.
When first presented here yesterday there were a lot of "we need to digg, Anons!".
Wouldn't need to say that if a big chunk of the sauce was already presented.
That said… nothing wrong with digging what was presented - just let's not jump to presumptive conclusions about this yet until better more fleshed out sauce can be found.
Ok, I get you.
Much diff than is what's in there true.
My take on that is, yes, Millie designed her doc more as a persuasion device than a fact finding mission.
HCQ prolly cures that, too.
Which bread is better so far?
The Boogaloo
The margins are thin rn - wouldn't take much for either chamber to tilt back in the other direction.