At least 846 Dead People Tried to Vote in Michigan’s August Primary — 10,694 Votes Rejected — This Is Why Democrats Want Mail-in Voting

Here’s why Democrats want mail-in voting.

So all of the dead people can vote again.

At least 847 dead people tried to vote in Michigan’s August Primary.

Over 10,000 votes were rejected.

Michigan clerks rejected 10,694 mailed ballots during the August 4 primary.

Of those, 846 ballots were not accepted “because the voter was dead,” the Detroit News reported.

Further, 2,225 ballots were denied because there was no voter signature on the envelope, and 1,111 votes were discarded because the voter moved to a new address after submitting the ballot. The state claimed the dead voters died between the time they submitted the ballot and when it was counted.

Michigan’s largest city, Detroit, received 820 ballots that were ultimately rejected, according to the paper.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is demanding the legislature pass a bill requiring city and township clerks to call voters who have obvious flaws with their ballot, such as a missing signature.

“With turnout and absentee ballot numbers expected to double or even triple in November, we could be looking at tens of thousands of Michigan citizens disenfranchised if the legislature again fails to act,” she said.

Meanwhile, more than 223,000 ballots were “undeliverable” in Clark County, Nevada, the Review-Journal reported.

The state opted for an all-mail election and “Clark County mailed ballots to all — not just active — voters, in part because of legal pressure from state and national Democrats,” according to the paper.

Clark County mailed 1,325,934 ballots, and nearly as many were undeliverable as returned: 223,469 and 305,000, respectively.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/least-846-dead-people-tried-vote-michigans-august-primary-10694-votes-rejected-democrats-want-mail-voting/

Major Development In Durham Probe Ignored During CNN, MSNBC Primetime Coverage

CNN and MSNBC devoted little coverage Friday and Saturday to the first development in U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.

Kevin Clinesmith, a former FBI lawyer, is expected to plead guilty to altering an email regarding former Trump aide Carter Page’s past association with the CIA.

CNN and MSNBC employ at least three former FBI and CIA officials as analysts, though none appeared on air to discuss the Clinesmith case.

MSNBC host Chuck Todd questioned whether the Durham probe was aimed at “creating confusion.”

CNN and MSNBC largely ignored the news Friday that a former FBI lawyer will plead guilty to altering an email related to Carter Page, the former Trump campaign aide.

Neither network mentioned the case against the former FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, in their primetime broadcasts, according to a review conducted by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The networks had brief segments during the daytime broadcasts that reported the news that Clinesmith would plead guilty to making false statements by altering an email that downplayed Page’s past work for the CIA.

Page had been an operational contact for the CIA through at least 2013 and provided information about his interactions with a Russian intelligence officer. Clinesmith, 38, added a line to a CIA liaison’s email in June 2017 that said that Page was “not a ‘source'” for the spy agency, according to the charging documents.

The case is the first major development in an investigation led by U.S. Attorney John Durham into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.

CNN and MSNBC would be well-positioned to discuss the case since the networks between them employ at least three analysts who worked on either Crossfire Hurricane or the special counsel’s probe. MSNBC also has former CIA Director John Brennan as an analyst.

MSNBC recently hired Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer, and Andrew Weissmann, a top prosecutor on the special counsel’s probe, as analysts.

Page was general counsel to Andrew McCabe when he served as FBI deputy director. She was directly involved in decisions made in Crossfire Hurricane.

Neither appeared on MSNBC on Friday.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/08/15/cnn-msnbc-kevin-clinesmith-john-durham/

Epstein's Accuser Claims Knowledge of Victoria's Secret Boss' 'Sexual Hang Ups', Court Docs Show

The unsealed court documents reportedly mention Alan Dershowitz making a claim about having a recording of one of Giuffre’s friends who allegedly admitted they were trying to "squeeze" Wexner for money.

Virginia Giuffre, the accuser of the late disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, revealed an apparent awareness of the lingerie preferences of Les Wexner, an American billionaire whose holdings include Victoria's Secret, the New York Post reports citing recently unsealed court documents.

According to the newspaper, this reveal comes amid the ongoing legal battle between Giuffre and Epstein's former lawyer Alan Dershowitz, as the latter insists that Giuffre is "trying to extort him by claiming he had sex with her while she was underage", and is now seeking to prove that she "did the same thing" to Wexner.

The document in question is a transcript of a phone call between Dershowitz and Wexner's attorney John Zeiger, and features the two discussing Giuffre's sexual abuse allegations against Wexner in 2015.

During the conversation, Dershowitz reportedly mentions recalling Giuffre's lawyer telling Zeiger that her client knew Wexner’s "sexual hang ups", noting how "[Giuffre’s attorney] did … say something about how he liked his girls dressed in — I don’t know what, negligees or", with Zeiger remarking how he thinks “there was a general reference to the type of lingerie and — and things like that, but no specifics”.

"It sounds like, you know, she knows he — he owns Victoria’s Secret, and imagines that as a result of that, he must be into the kind of lingerie that’s sold in the company. But I mean, she has a good imagination," said Dershowitz.

He also reportedly made a claim about having a "recording of one of Giuffre’s friends who allegedly admitted they were trying to squeeze the underwear baron for money", as the newspaper put it, with Zeiger inquiring in response about whether Dershowitz has knowledge of other men being "shaken down".

The newspaper points out, however, that other documents that were unsealed earlier this week feature Wexner claiming to "have no knowledge that he could share in a deposition that backs up Dershowitz’s claim he was extorted by Giuffre".

https://sputniknews.com/us/202008151080181515-epsteins-accuser-claims-knowledge-of-victorias-secret-boss-sexual-hang-ups-court-docs-show/

PRAY FOR EACH OTHER