The Deep State Election Surprise: An Analysis

This series of posts has four parts, and here are the key points:

1: The "far left" is simply a tool of the global cabal, which has no beliefs but simply seeks power.

2: In their fight for survival, the cabal would benefit from the sudden appearance of a "patriot" who equally opposes "extremism" on both the left and "the right".

3: A Constitutional loophole allows Congress to install anyone otherwise qualified as acting President, and there is a very plausible path that would get many Republicans in Congress to support this.

4: Q team knows their plan, and the Storm is likely coming before the election.

>>10303083

1: They Want You Divided

The real enemy is the global cabal, which has no political views and views politics simply as a means of maintaining power. (Think the Inner Party in Orwell's 1984.)

By the global cabal, I am talking about those who effectively control the financial system in nearly every country. They can effectively "print" their own money, and they can use their inside knowledge of theoretically "distant" financial conditions to make "risky" investments that miraculously turn out well, and they can engineer all manner of criminality, and then profit from it, sometimes directly, but also more insidously by profiting from remedies for the harm done ("cures" for "disease", etc.)

Such people are simply criminals and do not have political views, be they "left-wing" or "right-wing". It is easy to forget this fact, since in recent times they have been working their evil most overtly via others who espouse "left-wing" views, most obviously the Antifa street thugs wreaking violence on a daily basis. But think back to the 2003 invasion of Iraq: in that case the same people cloaked their evil under the camouflage of patriotism, unleashing destruction via a war grounded in falsehood, and having no clear goal.

It should not surprise us, in principle, that such people would be willing to sacrifice their own unwitting agents of destruction (e.g., Antifa) if it serves their broader ends. For years, I have remembered a scene from A View to a Kill (not the best Bond film, but some things stick) where the villain orders the flooding of his vast underground caverns (to set off an earthquake) despite them being filled with his own workers. That is the sort of villainy we are dealing with, and I see nothing surprising about the idea that they would brutally betray those fighting for them.

That said, it is easy to forget this if we focus on those doing the fighting and lose sight of their masters.

>>10303087

2: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing

It has occurred to many that the Biden/Harris ticket is astoundingly weak. This was evident when it was Biden alone, and many anons have proposed theories on how Biden will be replaced or controlled. But Kamala Harris is no Dick Cheney to Biden's Dubya; she is a sycophantic floozy who slept her way to the top. Is this the team that is going to save the global cabal from destruction?

It seems ludicrous to suppose Biden/Harris wins in a fair election, but only slightly less ludicrous to think they can pull off a convincing steal (even with the extra "tool" of mail-in voting), given that we have been long prepared for this move on their part. Has the cabal really bet its survival on the chance that they can pull it off?

For the cabal, a different option exists in principle: might they not contrive a "savior" who opposes the "extremism" of both left (Antifa) and right (the "far right QAnon conspiracy theory" - the fake news routinely calls it "far right"). There is "space" in our current political setting for such a savior, but the role is currently unoccuppied. Think carefully. Most of those who will vote for Biden do not support the dangerous absurdities now promulgated by the far left: some don't know about them, some don't link Biden to them, some think Biden is the lesser of two evils, etc. At the same time, most of those likely to pull the lever for Trump are NOT currently "believers" in the "QAnon conspiracy theory". Some may be oblivious to it, some may have a negative view, and an even greater number might become CONVINCED that it is dangerous nonsense if the MSM were to publish "exposes" that explain how the Trump administration itself is using "Q" to manipulate the public.

Since "exposing the Q psyop" (and claiming it is malevolent) would involve admitting that it is a government run operation, it is perhaps best for the cabal to save this move until the last possible moment. I suspect this is the reason why no such "savior" for the cabal has yet arisen.

And I think the last possible moment will be shortly before Trump's term expires on January 20. As I will explain in further detail, Congress has the power to elect more or less anyone as acting President if no President has been properly elected. And they might well do so, with some Republican support, to ensure that the Presidency does not become vacant. A "compromise" figure will be needed, perhaps some ex-military man like Adm McRaven or Gen McChrystal who might also gain Democratic support.

Such a person might assume office emphasizing that he is simply a caretaker who will respect the election results when they are tabulated. And then, to buttress support among Trump voters who rightly suppose the election is being stolen, he will crack down hard against Antifa, arresting even some of their mid-level organizers. But this will serve as cover for the coming exposes of how Trump was illegally using the government to stir conspiracy theories among his political base. The Q op will be terminated, 8kun will be shut down, and anons will be exposed and some arrested. In any case, there will be no ready venue to discuss what is really happening, so the MSM narrative will win, and "consensus" will emerge that Trump should not be allowed to regain office, whatever the voting tabulations reveal.

Stricter regulations will ensure that nothing like "QAnon" ever gets a foothold again, and the cabal can resume the focus on achieving bureaucratic totalitarianism.

Is this possible? Does this seem like a better move for the cabal than hoping that Team Biden can pull off the steal?

>>10303099

3: The Law of the Land

Assuming that the cabal has some figure prepared to be their savior, a clear path exists to the acting Presidency.

The goal for the cabal on Election Day will not be for Biden to "win". The goal is rather to prevent any consensus that Trump has won, and this will be accomplished if enough precincts fail to report results, and this can be achieved if there is enough mail-in voting. But Election Day will simply be a prelude to the lawsuits: dozens or hundreds of lawsuits will be filed around the country, all different, but all alleging illegalities in the manner in which votes are being counted. Since the manner in which Presidential elections are actually conducted hinges on the confluence of federal, state, and local laws, and local codifications of voting procedures, these lawsuits will be difficult to sort out. And there won't be an option for the Supreme Court to step in, like in 2000, and call an end to it, since there won't be ANY set of results to stick with.

The upshot is that some electors will not be elected by the time they are supposed to vote in their respective states for President, and so some of these votes will not occur, and so some electoral votes will not be sent to Congress by the time the new Congress is supposed to tabulate them and officially elect the President. Maybe some votes will arrive, but they'll conveniently be for Biden. And so the Republicans who control the Senate will refuse to participate in the joint sesssion of Congress that is supposed to count the votes, since they rightly won't wish to "steal" the election for Biden. And so this session will simply not occur, even though it supposedly must. This eventuality will become evident in advance, and it will appear nearly certain that Trump's term will expire on January 20 with no President-Elect established.

Now here is the crux of this whole scenario: contrary to popular belief, the Speaker of the House will not become acting President. At the very least, it is far from obvious that existing legislation makes the Speaker acting President in that scenario. Read the following very carefully, and think for youself:

3 U.S. Code CHAPTER 1—PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/chapter-1

U.S. Constitution, Article II, Secton 1:

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/

And the 12th, 20th, and 25th Amendments:

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-12/

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-20/

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-25/

It seems that legislators have taken great pains to ensure that there is NEVER a presidential vacancy due to lack a President-Elect, but have not clearly provided for the case where Congress has simply failed to certify anyone at all. And in any case, if it does seem that the Speaker is supposed to take the role in that situation, this is "required" only by congressional legislation and not by the Constitution itself, and hence that "requirement" can be overriden by Congress, exercising its power under Section 3 of the 20th Amendment.

Suppose that the House as it exists in DC in early January 2021 has a majority of Democrats (regardless of how many Republicans were seemingly "elected" on Nov 3). Then REPUBLICANS will push the interpretation that the Speaker does not automatically become acting President, and demand that someone else be installed "temporarily". And the cabal, if they aren't total chumps as evildoers, have prepared for exactly this, and have someone ready.

>>10303109

4: My Fellow Americans

Is any of this likely to happen? I hope not, but I do think that Anons should investigate this option in more detail. There are likely many tweaks that could be made to the basic scenario I have outlined, and likely many preparations that can be made if this is the cabal endgame.

That said, my suspicion is that our guys on the inside have already worked out this scenario and planned for it. I see little sign that Q has pointed to it, and indeed Q has in recent times focused more directly on the D party as opposed to the cabal itself, and has repeatedly insinuated that their basic strategy is to use mail-in voting as a means to steal the election. But I suspect this is intentional misdirection. It makes sense to keep the enemy off-guard until it is time to strike.

In the press conference today, POTUS did highlight the difficulties of counting mail-in votes, saying:

"You're not gonna know this, if you really did it right, for months or for years."

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1294756093869133824

(see around 16:30)

Although he there focuses on the difficulties of counting the votes, as opposed to dealing with lawsuits, I think what matters is the unstated implication of what he said: if things go according to THEIR plan, he will not be President-Elect on the morning of January 20. And so this may be a pointer to the cabal scenario I have described.

The upshot of all of this is that I suspect the Storm must come before the election, perhaps even very soon, as there must be time to do it all before then. So I think anons should review the information warfare strategies Q set out in Q4509.

Twitter has obviously stepped up the banning of accounts, and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they ban POTUS from Twitter immediately after he sends "the tweet". I wouldn't even be surprised if they have set up an algorithm to auto-block that very tweet, possibly including textual variants. Maybe the tweet will come in the form of an image that includes the given text, perhaps even distorted like a captcha (kek) or something clever in case they are trying to auto-detect that too. In any case, I am confident we will catch the signal when it comes and will fight and will win.

>>10303768

I'm confused.

I thought NORAD tracked incoming nukes…