>>10302775 (lb)

The entire thing is fake in my opinion. They only named already burned individuals in the "documentary".

They allege to go deep and look beyond "Obamagate" but do not make mention of Dearlove, Woolsey, the Roths, the Royals, not even HRC (she was only in passing). It's also an attempt to make it look like they wanted HRC to lose, which is asinine.

And I do hope anons are discerning enough not to fall for the source. Otherwise I guess we should just abandon qresearch and move to whatdoesitmean or yournewswire.

Also consider the tape of the arrest. She was allowed to go into the house to get her shoes. Not credible! She could have grabbed a gun. Police would accompany and possibly handcuff her. Also it appears to be a single policeman which is unusual as well.

Doesn't necessarily mean that Millie was in on it, but her source "Tore" definitely is not credible. There are also some weird things going on with the other source, the guy who allegedly set up communications systems and/or an (totally overrated, imo) alleged AI system. AI certainly plays a role in predicting trends and other stuff but you don't really need it to taint a jury. I think that is ridiculous. The guy apparently hooked up with George Sweigert a while ago.

Also look at previous notables:

>>10301505 (pb)

>>10301699 (pb)