>https://www2.qanonbin.com/paste/hI4lku5HB
not notable
imo
except as a HIT PIECE against POTUS
if notabled, should be notabled as such!
Dems want to prosecute POTUS
but unfortunately (for them) have no evidence of any crime
(qbin not relevant, just leftover)
notable second
maybe a good idea to pre-combine hcq with zinc
but people can also be educated
RE the notable below:
article reads like a hit piece, e.g.:
…The drills involve so-called combined command post training…
Also speaks of a spike in CV - propaganda?
Not sure it's worth a notable.
be careful with this study, it was retracted
(could be totally political but anons should know….)
see:
https://retractionwatch.com/2017/05/08/retracted-vaccine-autism-study-republished/
Was posted here another time recently
Here is what I posted after digging on it:
#10157673 at 2020-08-02 06:59:29 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #12998: Part Bake, Part Ebake Edition
>>10157606
hmmm….
the article from which this chart was probably taken is likely the same one RETRACTED (May 2017) due to its claims linking autism to vaccination.
The Q is whether it was really scientifically invalid or simply very unpopular…..
= = = =
excerpt:
For the second time, a journal has quickly retracted a study that suggested vaccines raise the risk of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
The study first raised a furor last year, prompting a Frontiers journal to quickly retract it. After it was republished in the Journal of Translational Science this month, that journal has also retracted it.
Although the titles of the two papers changed, the abstracts were nearly identical. Both studies surveyed the parents of 666 home-schooled children, 39% of whom where not vaccinated, and concluded that vaccination increased the risk of neurodevelopmental problems, particularly if children were born prematurely.
A representative of the Journal of Translational Science told us "Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children" has been retracted, and it will update us with an explanation….
https://retractionwatch.com/2017/05/08/retracted-vaccine-autism-study-republished/
if you're gonna keep this notable
>>10304080 (2017) Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated study of 600+ US children
can you add this post stating that study was retracted, so at least anons know?
Article is pretty darned biased:
the allies have downsized much of their combined training activity after Trump unilaterally suspended large-scale field training with South Korea after his first summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in June 2018. Trump then seemed to adopt North Korea's traditional view of such drills….
a retracted study is a big deal. That info should always be included.