Vaccines were my most significant "red pill". A LOT of "retractions" are forced because the studies in question raise questions about pharmaceutical products.

The Mawson study was significant because, despite direct requests/inquiries from Congress, the CDC has categorically refused to do a true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated health study. Mawson represented an effort to get the information in spite of the CDC roadblock.

Here is the kicker. The CDC has currently given to an "outside contractor" (as I understand this) their VSD (vaccine safety datalink) program. They ARE tracking the health outcomes of vaccinated children but they do not want this information in the hands of the public or Congress. I hope that when Q says they "have it all" they mean this, too.

The US vaccine program, because it is 100% liability free for the pharmaceutical companies and because a doctor who KILLS your child (this is what most cases of SIDS are) cannot be held civilly liable (though I wonder why they are not criminally) has given US pharmaceutical companies carte blanche to use the program to deliberately create the host of chronic illnesses we see currently in the US population. If you give a child the "full schedule" you do not simply raise the risk of harm, you guarantee it.

One result of the Mawson study was the realization that allergies are VASTLY higher in vaccinated children. All those epipens (and their unforgivably high costs) are due DIRECTLY to what I call the US vaccine "pogrom". Why do the pharmaceutical companies make sure US consumers pay the highest prices in the world? Because they can get away with it since some of the drugs become necessary when you get a vaccine caused disease. Type 1 diabetes is a VACCINE INJURY.

If the vaccine program was stopped, I can easily guarantee that virtually all chronic illness in our population would dramatically decrease. This is not because I am clairvoyant, but because as a former student of medicine (top of my class), parent, and late blooming nutrition enthusiast I have seen the evidence, over and over again. All the repressed science, murdered and discredited scientists and alternative doctors, and most importantly the parental testimony point in but one direction.

Sadly some of the immune system damage to several generations of US citizens appears to be heritable to offspring.

Autism may not be exclusively tied to the vaccine program, but US autism cases are directly related to vaccines. Injecting mercury and aluminum into babies has been shown, over and over again to create cases of autism and glyphosate in the food supply (which has been found in vaccines as well) is an additional kicker.

BTW, giving a child tylenol when they are vaccinated is extremely dangerous. Acetominophen depletes glutathione one of the few metabolic "safety nets" a child has when the injected poisons bypass all their defenses. NAC or N-acetyl cysteine (tylenol poisoning remedy) might be a good item in medicine cabinets.

This meme. Do you see it anons? When I look at this meme, I immediately think it refers to forced vaccination NOT lethal injection. Perhaps they are the same thing. If the DS wins, mandatory "COVID-19" injections are on the horizon, which are "their" execution method. If WE win trials and executions will follow for "them".

>>10305827

I received 4 DTPs (brain damage central) before I was a year and a half old. I now have some idea of what those shots did to me.

Satan is a liar and a murderer. However, God is so powerful that He can redeem even things "meant for evil". As a student of science I began to wonder: Were we made with "countermeasures" to some of the things done to us? I believe the answer is, resoundingly "YES"!

To me the weaponized autism on this board is one of the most miraculous, incredible aspects of "The Great Awakening". Our "enemy" did not mean to do us any good, but his evil plans, once again, have backfired.

>>10305836

This is really important. If someone 80 years old loses a year of life due to "COVID"/coronavirus whatever the heck that is "one person year". However, if a baby or child dies and loses nearly 80 years of life that is 80 "lost person years".

The article is probably still out there, but RFK, Jr's "Children's Health Defense" presented a comparison between the deaths attributed to "COVID-19" versus the lives saved during lockdowns because SIDS dropped as a consequence of babies not getting their "well baby" vaccines. If you do the comparison using lost "person years" you discover that the "person years" saved is pretty significant compared to those reportedly lost due to "COVID".

>>10305868

https://www.madinamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DSM-II.pdf

Well, your perspective is a little different than mine, but you are on to something with your post. Injected aluminum and mercury are not guaranteed to affect the same brain areas equally. I think falling IQs, emotional problems (being a "snowflake") and general "normie" ignorance could be related to vaccine damage.

It was known as far back as the 1960's that "inoculation" could cause brain damage/mental retardation (aka "developmental delay") as this screen cap from the linked DSM II shows.

I am pretty sure that my social issues were tied to the vaccines that damaged me. In middle age I got off all pharmaceuticals including acetaminophen. I was led to a few methods of detoxing and took care to deal with the emotional baggage (still doing that). Even at my stage of life, I see improvements in my ability to relate and cope. Some of the same emotions are present, but not overwhelming. Anxiety was through the roof (known relationship to vaccine injury) and it is now controlled with diet, prayer and detox.

>>10305929

Their stories were sure part of it. I have a copy of "Vaccine A". Bombshell stuff. Basically admitting vaccines are a great as bioweapons.

>>10305937

"Traitor in Chief" (Obama) was probably a part of that.

If you research the history, the 1918 "flu pandemic" was apparently started by a vaccine experiment conducted by a Dr. Frederick Gates on military recruits in Kansas.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19868270/

My screen cap is ugly due to my antiquated computer.

>>10305957

I think this is how my state has turned school vaccines into a requirement even though religious exemption (in our state constitution, I believe) is available.

They tell you to fill out "their" form to get the exemption, even though in the past all it took was a note from the parent. Then they put up hurdles such as having to go to the health department and sign for the form. Meanwhile the actual form contains lies that they want you to agree to such as that you are putting your child at risk by not vaccinating (the opposite is true).

I think maybe the court cases you reference would allow parents to reject vaccines.

>>10305956

I basically agree with you. However, people have differing tolerances for confrontation. I am 100% determined to get free of the "system" but my situation does not presently allow me (nor do I really want to, yet) give up my job which currently "requires" masks.

That said, when my city put in their mask "ordinance" it was my last straw of tolerance for this liberal sh*&hole. I have cut my spending in this town by, probably, greater than 90%. I ventured out into the still rational towns nearby and found that real people, with heads unbowed and faces unmasked, still exist. It has been wonderful.

>>10305983

I agree. Not sure but I think this protection is either violated constantly or "they" wrote in an out. There is no question that elites want our vaccine records to be incorporated into our "ID". Some have interpreted the "COVID" moniker to mean "Covert ID" as in the "vaccine" they hope to implement will include a chip or invisible tattoo.

One theory on the apparent "suiciding" of Daniel Best, Trump's appointee for addressing pharmaceutical pricing, is that he discovered the agenda to incorporate vaccine records into the new ID for travel. Apparently that has already happened in one South American country.

>>10306002

I recognize my "weakness" in this area. I am internally motivated and anything that demands or requires something immediately raises my hackles. I got into a really tough conversation the other day because I was really angry over the "edict" issued in my city. There is no reasonable way to prove masks are an overall positive for health protection and individuals ought to be able to weigh their own options. Of course there are situations in health care where a mask intuitively and practically makes sense as well as in high risk activities such as working with some pathogens, chemicals and dusts. Two layers of fabric wrapped around your face for hours is nonsense.

That said, we are being conditioned yet again to fight amongst ourselves in order to never examine the elite's agenda against us.

I have chosen to wear a mask in a few situations to help another feel more comfortable. Also, I think covering my face may be desirable to avoid security tracking cameras. Not because I want to commit crime but because it is an abomination for free people to be tracked for the purposes of analyzing and controlling their activities. In that sense, masking up, even in cars, may indeed as the President has stated be patriotic.