>>10307790

It only corresponds to what Snowden was revealing about PRISM.

The idea Q mentioned was that the contractor who developed the tools for the NSA PRISM collection system had the keys to create their own version.

PRISM wasn't just a set of tools for data collection/interception - it was an application framework built into computer networks at the operating system kernel level, where possible, and APIs.

Why do you think every web browser is built atop Google's Chrome? Why do you think "update culture" is pushed religiously?

>>10307876

https://youtu.be/qqbQ_oKmflM

Present and accounted for, Sir.

>>10308168

It surprises me how many anons think they can read Q like a forecast.

That's not how it works. Q is telling you factual things. Q is also asking you valid questions. Q will also reference something others have said.

Your job in all of this is to grasp what your own mind is doing and to understand the difference between what you think and what Q has said. When you can understand what Q hasn't said, you gain insight into why Q asks the questions she does.

Q also never said she was American or to what country/cause one is a patriot to. Patriots have fought each other, quite bitterly, over the eons of our existence. Good people have killed each other over those same eons, as well.

Many anons have yet to realize that governments are tools to be used by those who hold power. When the citizens do not hold this power, and politicians serve it, who holds the effective power over human affairs? What does it mean for the guard to be changed among those who hold that power?

>>10308280

It was pretty obvious before the move to 8. If you paid attention to the exchange.