Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 8:40 p.m. No.10314055   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4132 >>4196 >>4257 >>4359

>>10312727 USPS patents a blockchain based mail in voting system despite president trumps critics (notable from pb)

Alright, the boomers are mostly asleep by now so hopefully now we can talk about blockchain without all of their drooling and screeching.

 

Blockchain has wide-ranging uses. Most of you think of Bitcoin when you think of Blockchain and while Bitcoin is much more valuable than many here and in places like this seem to realize (with few exceptions), commerce is one single area which can be innovated with Blockchain.

There's some serious words to be said about all of the different things Blockchain can do, but in this discussion we may want to focus on why it's applicable. Before we do that, here's a short list; Insurance as a whole, Healthcare, Education, Commerce, Banking, Information Exchange as a whole and much, much more. From certifying authenticity of Art or Academic documents to facilitating subscription-based payments, Blockchain's uses range much more widely than plenty generally acknowledge or accept.

In this case, however, we should focus on the pertinent issue - Governance. This isn't to be confused with the concept of Governance as it relates more locally to crypto or the Blockchain world, rather we're talking about actual societal governments. You should check out the links below:

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_20

https://www.mdpi.com/2199-8531/4/1/7

 

We can easily speak much more about this and we can extrapolate much further about all of the use cases, but just for a moment we need to consider the obscure boundaries of such a technology. Blockchain as a whole isn't just in its infancy, it's still nearly unrealized by anyone.

For the record, there's a great deal more than just an abundance of value in the economic world of crypto. Make no mistake, I'm not speaking on behalf while not being invested in it. However, I don't care to tell you what I've invested in. I'm not here to profit off of anything. I come here to converse with keen minds and experience your end of things, anons. If I wanted to profit off of you, I would tell you what I want you to invest in. Alas, I'll avoid it; I know better than to even tread down that road with any of you.

But, for the sake of the conversation arising organically, I'd like to urge you lot to take another look. Again, there's much more to Blockchain than cryptocurrencies, which I'm sure plenty of you have heard of at this point. While I don't think there's significant drawbacks like plenty of anons have suggested before around here, I think we need to take a closer look at the value of Blockchain as a whole.

Of course, it's always possible POTUS could be using reverse psychology. He's evidently a fan of bait and switch, so that shouldn't surprise any of us if that was his angle all along.

Maybe he wanted to nudge USPS toward the option to further secure the election. You'll remember, a key point of Blockchain is its immutable, decentralized ledger. This is the reason /ourguys/ were able to spot the foul play within the Bitcoin ledger, this is what makes it useful for things like authentication or other sorts of government-oriented protocols.

 

Anons, you mustn't pass this up. Do yourselves a favor and dive deep in to the Blockchain world. You will not regret it.

 

Oh and, as a final note, I do not endorse the Ripple guys that come here and shill the project, making wild claims about how it will be attached to the new "US Dollar". I do not share these views and am weary of anyone who brings up any specific project around here, just as I believe you should be. 1

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 8:50 p.m. No.10314135   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4153 >>4187 >>4214

>>10314110

Covid isn't not real, anon.

It's just that people that aren't already prone to viral/bacterial infections alike aren't really all that threatened by it unless they have an immune issue or otherwise have a comorbidity.

Even then it still shouldn't be a big deal considering we have HQC.

On top of that, masks are useless. You use gas masks and a completely sealed-off apparatus to defend against potential viral infections. A simple medical face mask will do hardly anything besides give you skin issues or force you to re-breath CO2.

Also, medical professionals are well aware of the futile use of ventilators.

 

It may be a ruse, but that doesn't exactly mean it's fake.

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 8:53 p.m. No.10314167   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4749

>>10314132

Precisely, anon.

Now imagine tamper-proof education (think about what [they] have been doing to the history books).

Now imagine tamper-proof digital transactions.

Now imagine tamper-proof banking.

Now imagine tamper-proof bureaucracy.

 

This is just the immutable aspect of Blockchain.

It's also trustless.

 

Do you know what a contract is?

Do you know what a smart contract is?

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 8:57 p.m. No.10314205   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10314187

It certainly is being exaggerated, but, again, that doesn't make it not real.

We can't offer them more ammo by being careless about how we phrase things. We need the normies to come around, so we have to talk from their end of things if we want to suck them in.

 

This is important.

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 9:04 p.m. No.10314263   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4319

>>10314244

Why would anyone at all be surprised that someone affiliated with the UN is familiar with MOS operatives, anon?

You bring hardly anything to the table. No one has or will claim Blockchain is "a magical fix all". No one at all will claim that the faggots don't understand or use Blockchain.

 

You've lead us nowhere with your additions to the conversation.

You aren't even contributing to the conversation, just bringing up people that have used it inappropriately and attempting to justify people being scared of Blockchain because of it.

This is careless and naive.

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 9:13 p.m. No.10314341   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10314319

What in the fuck are you talking about?

You weren't not allowed to talk about those things before I responded to that notable about the USPS maybe using Blockchain.

 

You're clearly trying to derail the conversation.

Thinking people can't widely use Blockchain is a mistake and you attempting to exercise a consensus out of the audience is a sophomoric attempt at manipulation at best.

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 9:16 p.m. No.10314367   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4383 >>4411 >>4419 >>4497

>>10314293

>>10314342

Are we seriously going to devolve in to the Lucifer argument again tonight?โ€ฆ

Good god.

Stop confusing the newfags and do your own research.

"The Church" (which is a convenient cover name for Romeโ€ฆ which never died) fed you lies all of your lives. Stop depending on them to develop your spiritual nature.

 

Lucifer is not what you're told it is.

The Light-Bringer has come here many times and in many forms and if you focus, ignore the normies and trust yourself, you will summon it in due time and be able to also tap in to the divine tether that inspires and protects us all.

 

We've gone over this countless times with you.

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.10314397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10314359

Pretty much.

I think it's easy to spot what kinds of things could be improved via Blockchain adoption, but the issue is knowing how specifically to do it.

At a certain point, we're dependent upong the more competent among us to really innovate things. Once we do have wider adoption, though, we should see widespread innovation.

It's super exciting!

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 9:29 p.m. No.10314452   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4511

>>10314383

"God" isn't a he, she or it.

"God" is everything and everywhere. All of everything is "God".

If by "God" you mean a controller of this realm, then you're sort of on to something.

The "God" of this place certainly was surprised to find out that it didn't have the control that it thought it did, hence our being here and pulling this off.

 

Let's not be too quick to pull the rug out from under Norman, though.

 

>>10314411

Look at you catching on.

 

>>10314419

Free Masons appear to be the last vestige of the original Gnostics.

There's a very good reason they were corrupted this much.

They weren't always like this. They used to be noble.

The Gnostics never sought to control this place.

In fact, you would have called them Christiansโ€ฆ the first Christians.

 

Are you familiar with the similarities between the idea of Gnosis and Christ, anon?

Can you think about why they would overlap?

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 9:39 p.m. No.10314526   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4612

>>10314487

We need this to come full circle.

 

Thoth was a walking talking man like (wellโ€ฆ sort of like) you or I.

 

What color was his hair?

What color were his eyes?

Where did he come from?

What happened to him and his people before he arrived?

What did he teach?

 

>>10314497

Lucy is an aspect of the Sun/Son who rises every dawn.

SET steals his/her light each evening.

Anonymous ID: 4291cb Aug. 16, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.10314810   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10314783

They prefer El, Set, or the corrupted version of Saturn.

"Satan" is just fear.

Shouldn't you know more about these topics and be willing to convey it to the normies with us?

 

>>10314796

I can tell, fren.

It's been a wild ride.

I guess I'll see you on the other side.