Fuck.
Welcome to the Great Awakening.
How do you educate the masses about what is happening using NO LANGUAGE?
did you learn to do that or were you just born that way?
I will only endorse this if a certain percentage of the people are asked to verify their vote in person and file charges if it doesn't match after the fact. People are too complacent to check after the polling to make sure the process worked.
How do you make sure that everyone is seeing the actual data and not data tailored to them?
Don't put too much trust in any convenient system.
There are many weak links.
Get some rest, Brennan. You're going to need to be 'on' this Friday.
>The only solution that has the best architecture to mange this is blockchain.
Look - this is a slide. "Blockchain" is simply a mathematical obfuscation that makes compromise more computationally difficult in one single way.
It does NOT solve most of the problems involved.
Don't treat "Blockchain" as a magic bullet that solves all problems. It doesn't.
>The problem is the surplus of fraudulent votes from people who don't exist.
This is definitely a problem.
But not even the only problem.
There are many more.
crap…I've been doing it wrong for decades.
>Seriously do you understand the architecture? How it actually works?
Yes.
The problem is you don't understand all the stuff around it.
>please describe the "stuff" around it…
Ok, I'll bite.
1) You trust the math. Do you actually believe there aren't trapdoor functions in these algorithms? Do you even NSA?
2) You assume the data you'll have access to is the actual blockchain and not a version tailored to you.
3) The algorithms you're relying on assume there aren't other ways in the system from fooling enough of the population to get away with fraud. There are TONS of these. Another anon pointed out non-existent ballots.
Without systems in place that minimize ALL of the attack vectors, you're putting way too much hope that you're right about math. This is exactly the kind of naive reliance con-men (the elite) rely on in order to convince you that you've solved a problem when you actually haven't.
Look at how Switzerland votes. They all stand in a public square and hold weapons above their heads so everyone can see how many people voted. They validate the votes with their own eyes in real time. No technology, no bullshit. The reason they use weapons is to remind everyone that if there's any funny business, blood can be shed.
Tell me…how many years did it take the security experts to figure out that the Diffy Hellman reference key wasn't actually a prime number?
>Why use Diffy Hellman?
My point wasn't to use Diffie Hellman. My point was to point out how easily you can think you're doing something secure when you have fuck all security in fact.
As others have pointed out, the "stuff around it" is actually more important than what you're talking about.
>See the Jewish Gaslight Mind Fuck?
Yes, we see you. You're fucking obvious and bad at what you're trying to do. Just stop.
>Elliptical curve…It hasn't been compromised.
That you're aware of. In my mind, I wouldn't touch it with your ten foot pole.
The only encryption I'll trust is one time pads generated from true hardware sources that I build myself with no digital equipment in the loop that I didn't design and build.
With all due respect, I'm done. Goodnight.
PS: Those with power have more computing power and tricks up their sleeves than you're aware of.