>square , square. It's like a big spaceship…It's square. I mean. I'm looking at it. Well, it could have been rectangular but the perspective of it was so huge and giant that it had a top, a bottom, sides and it could have been a rectangle but it seemed like a square, cube, whatever. And this is pre-Star Trek Borg, you know.<laughs> I understood this before the, you know, it was square, like a big, gigantic metal spaceship. It's fly…floating in space and it ain't a planet, you know. It ain't round. Okay, and it's got that door, the inverse…. if you want to call beings from a spaceship 'aliens', I don't know
There must have been some lesson in letting a few million kids get sucked up then.
What don't you understand about "No Gods above. No Gods below"?
>güđ thing you'll just be a shell of an tachyon echo in a null/dead spacetime
If that's the final conclusion, if that's what it takes, so be it.
If you can 'understand', then you can understand where some Anons are from.
You all do a shit job of shilling. All of you.
>Have you looked into the architecture? What makes you think it will be comped? Please feel free to sauce your claims. I can show you how it will not be compromised
Oh gee, where have I seen this sort of argumentative technique before? Let me think…
Keep in mind us retards here have been doing this for decades now. It's very simple to take apart your sentence structure, your word usage, punctuation usage even down to your carriage usage and understand that you're not from here.
Very easy. Keep up the "good" work though.
>What could go wrong with blockchain voting
Is this nigga serious? Maybe you should argue for mail by pigeon. Easier to ague for.