>>10317723
>Yeah, I live in the first two letters.
Lol, that's true.
>Can't think of a prison that starts with a J here.
A person you mean?
[CA_J] == Lady Justice is coming to Ca.
Have a great day. Get paid in cash.
>>10317738
>Why 2022, midterm elections?
something like that... probably before then, but.. yeah. just an opinion.
That's the thing:
Let's have some fun with my opinion:
"Do you believe your efforts here persuade people to stop the pursuit of TRUTH, CALIFORNIA JUSTICE?"
context is ok, sentence is still sensical..
The form of WORD_P is a clue here, imo. Q is referring to a place, probably even the place the poster was posting from. Referring to the poster's person would have given no gain to Q, but putting attention on California, would.
Why?
Anons don't dox and zero gain would have been gotten, by prompting anons into doxing that poster, which the shills did do.
Since Q is an anon, I think they honor the customs of anons.
jim, joe, aunt jemima… doesn't matter in the context of the drop, imo. At the end of the day the context was "here, this is what happened to your network; do you think you even matter?"
>But that person got Q's attention and a personal drop,
So did I. I dropped the Mark Twain quote when Q was asking about the msm and fake polls.
Q's responses to people do not make those people important.
>You areplaying with firewhen you expose these powerful people and organizations.
This counts for every participant here.
This is why anons reject clowns who show their real-world faces.
Because they know it means those individuals have protections that anons do not enjoy.
That is all.