I don't care if he sucked the peanuts out of her asshole while being drenched in olive oil and wearing an Anita Sarkesian mask while humming "Free Bird". If she is serious she should have went to the cops if she had a problem, anything else is bullshit and just an ever growing female play for either attention, gimmie bucks from beta's, or an "I am about to hit the wall and need a man" movie to get her noticed by some poor bastard.
Now hold on, hold on hold on, there was something I was recently looking into which led me off course and eventually led to that name. I need to look into this because that name was associated with some really odd shit from accusations I read from long ago, before 2000 even.
McGowan has actually proven herself several times now to be very much serious about going after these people and doesn't seem to give a shit about the Hollywood reaction either. So this might be something. She definitely doesn't like us but her claims do tend to always appear legitimate.
Cavuto doesn't get to pick who he wants on the show so Fox definitely allowed this to happen. Very odd by Fox but then again this is a group that hired fucking Donna Brazille and outside of two shows is steadily going to CNN levels.
Oh I mean it very well may be true. I just hate these come late to the party accusations when they should have been done immediately. Fucking hate the message it sends to young women and how much it is decimating normal relationship pair bonding for people. I would absolutely support the exposure and decimation of anybody, regardless of politics, who assaults or mistreats a good woman but in this case it just feels like yet another one of the issues of politics pushed exposure.
Though I will admit that chick is not the normal type of girl to be involved as she is much better looking than the norm who make those accusations. This girl could get any man she wants so there may be something to it if she would stop talking so fast, produce evidence, and restate it all.
Had to sit here a moment and consider if I was thinking properly since I would totally smash that and I wanted to make sure I wasn't thinking with the wrong ideas and was clearly seeing it all.
Outstanding mind anon, you are one of the few who I have noticed can see it. He is always the primary pusher of that and it always comes up to shift eyes from something when he does. Very well done spotting that pattern
They all talk and stay in their lane of bots or indoctrinated fools on Twitter while thinking that Twitter is real life. None of them have ever and would ever come on these breads, announce themselves as any normal journalist would do, ask legitimate questions, and be able to take the absolute exposure and destruction of their credibility that would follow for going up against people who they couldn't hold a candle to intellectually or otherwise. So let little Jared have his say and believe he is important as Twitter is seriously all they have and they know they can't go anywhere else and do what they do because Twitter assures their word is supreme.
There is precedent and at this point a steady track record to show that Podesta has long used UFO investigations and the discussion of aliens during key points of current events which appear to be an issue that looks unfavorable.
Podesta was never a primary investigative situation for myself so others will be able to shed exacts on your question but I do know that he has in the past brought up these things and made public appearances to bring up these things during important events which had nothing to do with UFOs or Aliens. For example there is a video of him promising the American people that Clinton would reveal all about what they know and what they currently believe in the government if she was elected. Also directly after the, I believe, either Comet pizza issue or after the HRC interview about the Comet incident where he had an interview again bringing up disclosure about UFOs and aliens. Then a third time after the Mueller report fell flat and his interview which made Mueller look bad where Podesta again came on and brought up the need for disclosure of UFOs which was directly followed up by a former military pilot being interviewed by, I think Daily Mail if memory serves, to push the issue even further.
He also made an appearance on some foreign show, I believe Australia but you will need to verify that as I might be wrong about location, directly after the video emerged about those objects over the moon about six months back. So he has a pretty obvious track record at this point of his appearances about these things and when they come up in regards to current events.
I don't see why anyone would have an issue with a safer type of social media site that was based on those values. It would definitely solve a lot of issues if properly presented and controlled. What issue do you have with his post there?
Wait, what? You are going to judge Tucker Carlson on his interview with Info Wars connected fucking Millie Weaver? Jesus Christ, nice try but that pretty much gives you away.