Anonymous ID: 1c59da Aug. 18, 2020, 6:41 a.m. No.10329627   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10329598

>We leave and they miss out on a large purchase. Was real good for muh kid to see. I said “if everyone walked out of stores that did this crap it would end.- if everyone stopped wearing masks it would end. It stops when we all quit playing along”

 

>I get some people have to wear them to work- but EVERYWHERE else you go should you should be mask FREE.

 

Agree.

If Employees PROTESTED, their employers might come to their senses as well.

Anonymous ID: 1c59da Aug. 18, 2020, 7:36 a.m. No.10329982   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0089

>>10329930

Just came across this. Quickly scanning, thought this was interesting.

 

In what became a pattern of singling out Anthony, all the women voters were arrested,

but only Anthony’s actions were examined for evidence of a crime. An examination

on November 29, 1872, reviewed the evidence against Anthony to determine if all the

women should be held in federal custody and referred to a grand jury for possible

indictment. John Pound presented the government’s witnesses to establish the facts

in the case. Was Anthony a woman? Did she cast ballots? How many ballots did she

cast? Was she challenged? Did she take the oaths? –The two Republican inspectors of

election, already under arrest themselves for allowing the women to vote,– were the

principal witnesses, followed by Sylvester Lewis and a clerk who kept the register of

voters.

 

https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/trials/susanbanthony.pdf