>The only issue I have had with "E" is the spamming, the naming to appear on the level of QAnon, and the failure to stop the spamming after being repeatedly called out for it. The data on their twitter has never really appeared divisive or accusatory or even bad in regards to the research here but their methods have always made them very suspicious at best. Not to mention that anyone who is on Twitter and allowed to discuss this research is done so at the allowance of Twitter which has a track record of not allowing that. So either E has found a way to stay so far below their radar to be noticed (which I do not believe) or Twitter has a reason for allowing them to remain in play.
I can not agree more!