Anonymous ID: b8cb7f Aug. 18, 2020, 6:51 p.m. No.10336228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6293 >>6300 >>6339 >>6422

Who is running Durham investigation?

 

special investigator William Aldenberg

 

https://twitter.com/hashtag/WilliamAldenberg

 

THE MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS GOING ON - ARE NOT SHARING EVIDENCE WITH EACHOTHER

 

DURHAM IS CLUELESS

 

The investigative agents, those who most people put their faith upon, are hampered by compartmentalized isolation of evidence. The system is purposefully set up that way.

 

Evidence is essentially silo'd.

 

The Durham probe (for lack of a more authentic descriptive) do not communicate w/The Hill.

 

Ex. HPSCI does not communicate w/Durham; at least they do not successfully communicate.

 

In part this is because the receiver would be accepting the political intents of the evidence.

 

Information, even valid evidence that would be useful for investigators, becomes useless when retrieved or originated from political entities

 

The result is actual Durham/Barr investigators do not know where most of the explosive evidence is located. This includes any documents that originate from inside this complemented process

 

As a result of this convoluted process; the Durham team knows little about any evidence their internal unit did not independently create.

 

This system design helps the compartmented and corrupt to escape accountability.

 

Durham investigators therefore do not have a handle over the totality of evidence that exists in the public sphere; because the public evidence exists as extracted from numerous individual compartments - some of which they do not / cannot peer into.

 

Previously both Senate and House staff admitted this was the fundamental flaw in their own investigations.

 

Additionally, this factual/structural flaw was confirmed to me today by the Durham investigative unit.

 

Repeat: Durham investigators do not have a handle on the totality of evidence that exists in the public sphere; because the public evidence exists as extracted from numerous individual compartments - some of which they do not / cannot peer into.

 

Today they saw evidence for the first time that was never assembled. You would be stunned at what they do not know, because the institutional and political compartmentalization blocks the investigative use.

 

There is no grand investigative plan. There is no bigger investigative design… because the quest to provenance evidence, the demanded process itself, must be self-originated.

 

As a result… customary DOJ investigations can continue (ad infinitum) and yet will not result in substantive action prior to the election.

 

That's where public questioning of investigative practices, and specific details, forces an investigative shift.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/08/18/the-essentially-accurate-point/

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1295817275401015299.html