PB/LB
>>10345287
>Didn't Q say the first indictment would "trigger mass pop awakening." Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anyone awakening due to the Clinesmith indictment
>>10345723
Well let's put a few together.
Fourth cap, Q asks about FISA/Mid Year Investigation.
Org Chart under James Baker.
Isn't Klinesmith FBI atty1 or 2?