they have 24 at the arboreum.
2 broke.
so they have 22 standing, and 2 that they let lay on the ground, in a way that is pleasing in the same manner of what is done at archiology sites when they did up a fallen over column.
when I heard about the arrest i said 'listen to this slander, they don't do this.' and 'she had to have done something that put them on her that isn't involved with this documentary'.
and the article you link explains it well from a source that is credible enough for me for this kind of a report . . .
what a bitch doing that , if what is alledged, to her mom!
'subversives?'
most of it are people trolling for respondents.
It's not subversive so much as annoying.
look, they pretend that there is this horrible hate and then they see if anyone agrees with it.
that's how they can tell if people are . . . needing education.
(this is my theory).
who does this? I don't know.
when do they do it? Every single bread for years.
why do they do it? to out the real haters.
is it horrible? Filter and move on if you don't like it.
when the French Revolution got to Versaillie, they left it as it was and turned it into a mueseum.
The idea about the grand architecture was to have it for all to use.
as long as the doors and hallways provide access for the public I'd rather leave the real columns standing so people don't stumble over them as they walk around.
where is the ship yard, anon?
usually it would be at the shore some place,near a port.
and they would have brochures and do advertising.
To me your image doesn't look real, it looks like an illustration.
I think it's a cool idea. I'd love it if they could string them out through the oceans and tie together a few thousand and make a subway that goes through it, cruise ships up top, in a line all the way to France or Portugal, and I could take a bus, and then a train and go through it for a extended travel vacation.
maybe in a few years.
the trouble is that the trolling for hate turns into an accusation that it's real apepole and a call to 'shut down' a valid method of communicating.
that only feed the hate: and demonstrates undue influenece, which he basically admits to in the other video.
unfortunately Facebook has turned into a major bully. And this chap said that they are 'important' to 'elliminate hate'.
I posit that 'elliminating hate' is vauge and meaningless as a goal.
some will say it's about control and undue influence of well-poshed insiders (well-poshed?) who maniupulate the channels of influence and shut everyone else out of it, who isn't in their click.
that's a valid accusation and this chap has nothing to counter it, and admits to colluding in Silicon Valley with known assoicates and funders of censorship : the 'silicon valley' insiders.