Hypothetically, any person who attempts to raise private donations to fund a proposed government security need which a treasonous Congress has resolved not to fund with "appropriations" (the theft of the American People via the Income Tax - read: Congressional middleman taking its vigorish off the top), said person could theoretically be charged with fraud REGARDLESS whether said person usurped any of the monies collected. Dollars to donuts this is what's going on.

Easy peasy but desperate expenditure of remaining ammunition.

somebody's inscensed that fd victim's photo was posted here

>>10357455

Someone who should be snatched, duct taped and deposited in the middle of Maidan Square with a few documents, photos pinned on him and a few memory sticks in his pockets or otherwise on his person. Right in front of the shrine wall.

>>10357527

99% GOP registered?

>>10357601

Pumping in the "crowd noise" during a NFL game. Let's see how the Saints do it against Brady and his Bucs without a crowd!!

>>10357640

gyf. lose the video gaming and get out of your mother's basement, read and ffs never post here again.

>>10357678

A good way to bring him in from the cold. Like will happen with JA. But fukk ES.

>>10357705

dey wheelie hat us.

>>10357744

SES

>>10357777

Technically anyone involved in raising private money for an important government security need, or for any reason for that matter, which a treasonous Congress won't appropriate $$$ for, can be indicted for fraud. Regardless whether said person touched a penny of said funds.But like all other "ham sandwich" indictments, this will be thrown out of court unless fifth column judge/judges are presiding.

>>10357946

Desperately expending all remaining ammunition with wild pot shots, anon.