>>10360822 (/lb)
>Again, only a jew would claim that.
Doubling down on playing the role of racist white supremacist by writing "Only a Jew would..." after I just explained that is what you are doing, only reinforces for everyone here to see that that is in fact what you are doing.
Attacking Jews whenever the fallacies of your claims are unmasked, isn't a rebuttal, it only shows everyone that DIVIDING US is your ONLY goal.
>"Racist" is a madeup word by jews.
It's not make believe to write racist premises as you are doing here.
It is a fallacy to attempt to rebuke or deny a concept by unmasking the identity of its author. The Theory of General Relativity is not proved correct or incorrect by unmasking the identity of its author.
Only ratiocination, logic, and evidence, show a concept as tenable or not tenable.
>Stating facts isn't division.
You are not stating facts, you are falsely accusing 17 million people of guilt without having shown any evidence.
>How many of them in control of the government, media, courts, technology, social media, and what you're allowed to say?
When you say "them", you are again not referring to 17 million, almost all of whom have nothing to do with any of the crimes to which you are fallaciously attributing to all.
The fallacy of composition is to attribute to the whole what is ONLY true of its individual parts.
Even if statistically there are more Jews 'per capita' who are 'in control' of media or movies or whatever, this by itself does not constitute any guilt on 17 million.
>They're a threat to our democracy.
No, DIVISION is a threat to our democracy, and you are pushing DIVISION.
>Modern jews have nothing to do with jews of the old testament. In fact, rabbinical judaism traces its roots to the pharisees. Which is the exact group of people Jesus condemned.
You contradicted yourself. If modern Jews are their own separate persons who 'have nothing to do' with people living 0-33AD, then they also have nothing to do with "Pharisees".
People are not guilty for the sins of their fathers.
Every individual is innocent until proven guilty.
>No.
Yes.
>I'm doing what Jesus told me to.
Jesus did not tell anyone to hate your neighbor.
>Which is to convert the jews.
Accusing Jews of guilt before being proved innocent is not an appeal to their good faith, it is an attack that divides.
>Why do you think that's a bad thing?
Straw man. What I am referring to in your posts is your DIVISIVE LOGIC that separates humanity into Jews and non-Jews.
Surely if your real goal was to convert people to Christianity, you would i clude Muslims and Atheists, who number in the BILLIONS.
>You are DIVIDING PEOPLE.
>So did Jesus.
Jesus united, that's why those who sought to divide killed Him.
>That doesn't follow at all.
It does.
>Jesus fulfilled the law and ended the old covenant. Remember the Bible?
This does not address the fact that attacking Jews is also an attack on Jesus.
>Revalations 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Yet you seek to divide humanity into Jew and non-Jew.
You're trying to divide the movement.
>It says convert the jews
No, it does not call upon anyone to 'convert' another. It calls upon the individual to redeem themselves.
Nobody is above another.
>because they're going to hell.
Whatever your beliefs, God is the judge, not you.
>You're defending people going to hell and attacking me
No, I am defending innocent people against your attacks.
>and you can't even coherently defend your position.
Oh I know you think I am, otherwise you wouldn't even be replying the way you do.
>Think about that.
You can't even claim to be replying to what I am saying unless you have already presumed that what I said is coherent.
Your turn.
>You can lie all you want.
You're lying.
>You're not even convincing yourself
Haha, nah, I convinved myself, you aren't convincing me because you're making errors.
>"Weaponized autism" comes from autists who love the truth.
Yes.
>You have no love for it
Oh yes I do, which is why I loved refuring you here.
>and can't even defend your ridiculous comments.
I don't need to 'defend' my positions, they speak for themselves, all I am doing is refuting your errors and exposing you as someone trying, and failing, to portray QAnons as white supremacists and your 'strat' is infiltrating religion as your means to do so.
This is a good sign actually, it means the Q movement is so large now that attacks against it (yours) are taking the form of spiritual attacks.
>You're so obviously a seething jew it's incredible.
You're panic is palpable.
Attacking Jews to divide the Q movement.
You're SKEERED.
>Go ask your masters for better arguments.
Hahaha, projection, scriptbot.
>But in the meantime, I'd repent.
I've seen Satanists say that.