Anonymous ID: 619518 Aug. 20, 2020, 2:37 p.m. No.10362146   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2162 >>2181 >>2198

>>10362127

Where did this witch thing start? I've tried to explain her church denomination (just boomer new ager stuff), but you guys keep saying witch. You're abusing the term. Witches pray to completely different things and have different rituals. You can still knock her, but these labels matter.

Anonymous ID: 619518 Aug. 20, 2020, 2:43 p.m. No.10362199   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2381

>>10362181

But it's not ancient history. She's part of the New Thought movement. A preacher in the "Unity" church. They have more in common with gnostics and theosophists than anything to do with witches. They distort Christ's teachings, but don't have anything to do with paganism. It's gnosticism.

Anonymous ID: 619518 Aug. 20, 2020, 2:54 p.m. No.10362348   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2355 >>2382

>>10362287

Not everything. Pythagoras had "opponents" in the general mercantile and craftsman classes of his day. The men who used science and math in pragmatic ways, and relied on measurable real world measurements (basically, empiricism). This has been somewhat reclaimed.

Anonymous ID: 619518 Aug. 20, 2020, 3:07 p.m. No.10362486   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2548

>>10362430

What are you talking about? Who do I follow? I'm trying to talk you about precision in terminology. I'm a stickler for it. Words have meaning.

 

New Thought adherents believe in the "Christ mind". Not pagan gods. And not animist spirits. Their error is not witchcraft, but thinking they all have the "Christ mind" within them. They definitely abuse Christian teachings, but it isn't witchcraft. It's just stupidity and delusion.