Column 5

I'm only talking to those who know what the hell I'm talking about.

Long, long, the Q question has looked for a Trump answer. 

First of all , in the Trump presser 8-19-20, there was NO Q question.

There was Qanon question.

Qanon is an outsider view. It started early on, caught on, likely much because it is totally unique, where as Q is not. There are many Q entities in this world. I dare to bet there is only one Qanon, thus it is unique, novel, specific, avoids confusion… for outsiders.

I have long fought the Qanon handle. It is a composite, a confusing conflation used out of ignorance. Q has gone along with it… I always felt in a bit of a mocking manner. Q mocks their attacks against Qanon and I perceive along with that, ridicule of the outsider term itself, Qanon. More recently Q has suggested moving away from IDing as Qanon… favoring WWG1QGA, you look it up.

Whatever the Q board, closing in on 3 years, there has never been confusion between Q and Anon. Nobody mistakes one for the other. Sure, absolutely WWG1WGA. And yes, we are all Q. Nevertheless no honest Anon claims to be Q. There is no Qanon within. We always all know the clear lines of demarcation, differences in function. It is fully true, Q came to the board as Anon, like everyone else. I do not think Q ever looked for a Q handle. Study the early days, bread after bread, including those with no Q. Q favored a handle of Patriot. Even the Q revelation was 'Q Clearance Patriot'. Q handle came out of the ranks of Anons of those days, to distinguish and establish unique Anon. Anons' voices wished to give this new arrival a handle. Board agreed, Q was used and accepted, first as tripcode and later as sign off. It was organic growth, maturation of fellow compatriots.

So POTUS in 8-19 presser said he did not know much of Qanon to someone, and likely a whole world full of people who know far less, outsiders all. Only a day or so before he turned away from a snarky Qanon question. The one on the 19th had an ounce of respect, sincerity, though from a front row snark. POTUS had no Q question. Perhaps he will never say much until somebody who has studied Q and can ask a damn intelligent Q question, C_A automatically disqualified.

So POTUS, suggesting ignorance about the misnomer Qanon… something that really does not exist and does not deserve his thoughts, full truth be understood. He felt a bit bad slighting Anons, post presser. Talking it over with Q, likely team, remedy was devised, 'Fifth Column' drop. There just happened to be an abundance of Anons alert who could immediately explain it all… THE Q PROOF. Many Anon give the meaning, many put up the graphic. One Anon says 1-21-2017 C_A speech, 14:50 marker. One Anon puts it in graphic with speech text… 'We get rid of the columns'. It was no sleepy night for many well informed Anons who jumped on it swiftly and rightly. It was Q PROOF in action, shot of confidence in arm for every Anon. Feel the love my friends.

10-28-2017 marker swiftly and suddenly moved and leaped to 1-21-2017. Q/Q+ moved the whole movement back to the start of term. I'd say rather officially. I for one will have trouble using 10-28-2017 as start date for Q. Are we about to learn much more, early 17+ code, in 17?

This Q stuff is only for those who put in the head time to get it, snarks not welcomed. 

PS Does any anon want POTUS 24/7, learning this board. I sure do not do that or want it from him. I think he has a bit more to do. How can he ever say he knows much about this board?