20/20
Underrated idea?
Think about it - if you were God, would you act like some sanctimonious SJW who after years of groveling is finally given control of the star chamber? Or something else entirely?
Disagree: the idea of empathy is routinely misrepresented as involving withholding of judgement regarding that which you are empathizing with. But it has nothing to do with that. It involves the attempt to understand others on an emotional and intuitiive level. And in fact it is crucial to attempt to understand even the WORST EVILDOERS in precisely this way.
An oxymoron.
Actual communists have certain ideals that are not in themselves wrong. Justice, for instance. But they are deluded morons who fail to grasp that "communism" has repeatedly produced horribly unjust societies, and that intellectuals have articulate the reasons why this is inevitable.
Satanists do not have any ideals at all.
However: communists, being very gullible, can be exploited by Satanists.
>would you like some tatters with that
Imagine living in a time…
when Donald Trump is President….
and defends Western Civilization…
by sending coded messages via a network of computers….
to Twisted Sister fans.
And that is what is wrong with Soros.
If we trust the story in the 60 minutes interview, he EMBRACED the idea of inflicting harm on others.
And now he is FULLY to blame, regardless of whether he was initially a victim.
That said, embracing a status as a "victim" is also itself INHERENTLY a moral evil, inasmuch as it leads one to think they have the "right" to exact vengeance.
Whether you have been "victimized" by others has JACKSHIT to do with what you should strive for as an individual, even if it might greatly influence how you get there.
>DS knows it.
Exactly this.
And do you think the DS is betting their lives on these dipshits?
Their top level players are NOT stupid.
In that case, you presumably have a counterstory that explains why Soros said what he said in that interview. (Or you can explain how it benefited someone to concoct that as a fake.)
FAIL.
Why does Soros as "Soros" benefit the enemy?
You are insinuating that he is not who he claims to be, and hence that the supposed falsehood benefits the enemy. But how does this purported falsehood benefit them?