Anonymous ID: 81f795 Aug. 21, 2020, 2:15 p.m. No.10375075   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5127

>>10375006

It's disappointing (maybe hurts a little) the only thing I can think of it is plausible deniability.

 

Plausible deniability is the ability of people, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by others in an organizational hierarchy because of a lack or absence of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions.

Anonymous ID: 81f795 Aug. 21, 2020, 2:19 p.m. No.10375127   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10375075

 

They both said they have heard of QAnon. That is one thing. They don't want to condone any conspiracy theories (obviously). When POTUS was asked about being a "hero" and "saving the world" from pedos and caniblas, he responded, "Isn't that a good thing?"

 

They are hands off so they don't have any evidence to link them to knowing anything else that we are doing. They haven't posted here, they don't talk about us to anyoneeverand once in a while they "accidentally on purpose" retweet a Q account.

 

I'd say: All good. Wait to see what Q does.

Anonymous ID: 81f795 Aug. 21, 2020, 2:35 p.m. No.10375289   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5315

Did anyone else hear the comment from Paul Preston about his "sources" saying the left is preparing something devastating to take down Tucker Carlson? It was on his radio broadcast earlier this week, I heard it live, but I can't remember if it was on Monday or Tuesday. Paul went on about it for several minutes. IDK what he knows but this wouldn't surprise any of us so we could all probably make the same "prediction" but it probably has to do with Tucker making racist comments like his producer that was fired last month. Will be interesting to see if this happens.

Anonymous ID: 81f795 Aug. 21, 2020, 2:51 p.m. No.10375459   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10375405

Sounds beautiful. I imagine this must be a hard time for POTUS. No matter your beliefs, for most people it's not easy when a loved one dies and even the most callus people need time to recognize their grief or it will come out in unhealthy ways later. And all the hatred people showed him when his brother died is despicable and I hope this brings him some comfort.

Anonymous ID: 81f795 Aug. 21, 2020, 2:55 p.m. No.10375501   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10375315

Yep, could be, but that sherpa lady claim went away pretty quickly when her dates didn't match up. I think this might be something else but they'll take him down, no doubt. It seems he probably even knows about it, and lately he's saying whatever is on his mind because he knows it's coming. He's stopped even trying to be PC.

Anonymous ID: 81f795 Aug. 21, 2020, 3:18 p.m. No.10375693   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5698 >>5708

Appeals court won’t step in for now on Trump tax records

 

By JENNIFER PELTZ22 minutes ago

 

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court said Friday it wouldn’t step in right away to delay New York prosecutors’ effort to get President Donald Trump’s tax records, potentially leaving the Supreme Court as his most promising option to block prosecutors’ subpoena.

 

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Trump’s request to immediately put Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr.’s subpoena on hold while Trump appeals to try to get it invalidated.

 

The appeals court said it would hold a hearing on the request for a delay, but not until Sept. 1. After winning a lower court ruling, Vance’s office had agreed not to enforce the subpoena before Aug. 28.

 

The office and Trump’s lawyers didn’t immediately comment on what the appeals court ruling might mean for that timeframe.

 

The case has already been to the Supreme Court and back, and Trump has said he expects it to end up there again.

 

Even if the tax records ultimately are subpoenaed, they would not automatically be made public, as they are being sought as part of a confidential grand jury investigation.

 

The Supreme Court ruled last month that the presidency in itself doesn’t shield Trump from Vance’s investigation.

 

But the high court returned the case to a Manhattan federal judge’s courtroom to allow Trump’s lawyers to raise other concerns about the subpoena. They did, arguing that it was issued in bad faith, might have been politically motivated and amounted to harassment.

 

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero rejected those arguments — and then turned down a request from Trump’s lawyers to delay enforcement of the subpoena while they appeal his decision.

 

They asked the appeals court for the same delay and got Friday’s answer.

 

Vance’s attorneys said they were legally entitled to extensive records to aid a “complex financial investigation.”

 

Vance, a Democrat, began seeking the Republican president’s tax returns from his longtime accounting firm over a year ago, after Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen told Congress that the president had misled tax officials, insurers and business associates about the value of his assets.

 

Trump has blasted the quest for his financial records as a “the most disgusting witch hunt in the history of our country.”

 

https://apnews.com/5ab190b1023120c4f504cc07066f9b60