>>10381267

QAnon seems to be used for the narrative (dangerous nazi racists etc)

They can't use "Q" because that is too specific, they would have to attack one person "and his followers" and that would raise too many questions in the reader "who is Q?" and that might lead the reader to wonder why the reporter doesn't just ask who Q is, or if POTUS or IAs know who Q is.

There's a subtle difference, and you'll note POTUS was asked about QAnon, the movement (and the anons), not about Q.

He can quite plausibly say he's "heard about" QAnon because as you point out, we know Q as Q. In general, while I'm aware of the term QAnon, I've never really felt part of that "movement". It's a kind of secondary (and good) effect of the GA, but I don't consider it to be what we do here.

Maybe that's unfair and QAnon has fed back in here now, but that's just the way I've always seen it.

Anyway, it's easier for the media to attack an amorphous group of people, clearly visible at rallies etc., than to tackle the actual issue of Q's existence and what Q is asking (and heaven forbid it's a group and not a 'he', kek)

>>10381276

I'm sure you realised right after posting that the election was in 2016, but apart from that I think you're on to something there.

I've been thinking on similar lines, but more like the obvious "what were conspiracy theories until recently?"

Elite pedophiles springs to mind for that one, as well as spying on political opponents using the assets of the state. Both proven and public domain.

Others are tantalisingly close to proof, but just don't ever quite get to tangible reality, or make a solid target. Things like Burisma, U1, Iran nuclear deal, satanic cults, etc.

I half expect 50 replies with a good list of sauces tying together the threads that pull these in to focus, but tangible reality really means indictments, convictions, unavoidable media coverage etc. To go from the enlightened awareness, that we have, to Common Knowledge.

On your side of the coin, I think the same problem exists. Unfortunately Common Knowledge these days means wall to wall non stop media coverage, and if the media is complicit in the conspiracy then it's never going to happen.

I've got one for you though, the Covington kids.

>>10381296

COINTELPRO

>>10381459

I can guarantee, when their names are released unnamed sources will confirm that their friends said they talked about QAnon a few times.

Mark my lips.

>>10381602

Not a suspect or target of the investigation into the origins of the Russia probe.

He might have committed crimes later on though.

I think this is round one, get all the people that set it up, then go for the people who put it into action later.

>>10381612

Sorry anon, 90's humour. It was a play on words of a famous GHWB quote, "Read my lips", as in "take note of what I am saying", or "mark my words". Get it?

(I've been on long enough to need a new captcha, obviously time to stop posting, kek)

>>10381632

I know how the media operates anon, intimately. I was also brought up surrounded by Marxist ideology, so I know how they think. I guess that can come across sometimes.

I'm not new to Q, but before that I didn't know I was indoctrinated.

If you're serious about changing the world, I think you need to prepare to encounter more anons like me.

It's just as easy for me to claim you're trying to demoralise the highest ranking anon here, and therefore a shill yourself. But I won't.

>>10381750

Pretty hard claims to back up anon.

I think you might be trying to demoralise after all.

>>10381816

Something beginning in a small triangle and ending in R?

>>10381832

Shipping reg too.

>>10381851

The FF was pretty weak. The woman in the car chase, who was an "alleged" QAnon.

Even the word "alleged" makes it seem like it's a crime now.