>>10381810 (pb)

no.

just telling you not to put on pretenses of speaking as if you are a 'voice of the board' and using phrasing that makes people feel as if you are part of the creep fest that stocks all the real posters.

your explaination about your strange new idiom . . . seems lame.

but if a little stupid criticism from me brings you down, you need to move along. I don't speak for the board either. you are in your right to say what you want. I review because the shills are vicious. Just seeing who you are. New is what you are here, is my guess.

keep it real

>>10381781 (pb)

I'm seeing your sweet side and starting to feel fondly . . .

cut it out . . .

not that it matters, but I 'get' your intentions much better now, one who knows to not identify as 'highest ranking anon'.

>>10382079

Q doesn't need our defense, we respect Q.

Q will chime in if Q needs to.

We don't have to explain Q. Read Q yourself.

>>10382087

are you admitting to a taint-push effort on your part?

>>10382094

That taint right anon . . .

>>10382097

well, realize that often we have these bakers, see, who like to put in ironic stuff that is humourous in their minds when people, the term is 'fall for it', when people fall for it.

but you think for yourself and you know to not use every item on the list . . . correct?

Does it work? Do people wake up?

People still go to those sites even at this late date?

the time is getting long, anon, the sands of time rush through the narrows of the middle. (middle of the hourglass)

>>10382111

wouldn't it be nice

if their script included them finally understanding

how they'd been coopted and made to be diabolic

from a very early age and they shake it off

and actually become helpful to others, instead of being 'bad overlords' infested with demonic thoughts that compel them to fetish marxism.

>>10382137

is anyone real not?

>>10382148

OK, I didn't get the reference.

The knights were tasked to do the holy, so they believed.

but often the 'sir' was a cuck at the castle, and wifie wants to move to the river-town and get out of the wilderness . . .

>>10382099

there is no 'cringeworthy Karen' as you describe anywhere, that's a psyop, that 'type' is a made up thang. In fact all the fine women with that name are capable and aware and think for themselves.

if you are a 'karen' it's not capitalized.

please get it right even though I don't like the word that you use, you used it so . . . don't make it a persons name.

I say Q doesn't 'need us' to defend Q.

that's saying we don't have to , on demand, follow through with the requests of those who badger us here.

but if we felt a good reason to defend Q we'd have a lot of them, and logistically we don't share them so often because it just gives those who hate us and troll us with shills, to be able to fake being us.

>>10382196

what is wrong with you?

>>10382238

?

no one here uses names, anon, except for namefags, and they have to be very beautiful.

>>10382278

the other one said it was a good thing to ask.

if you take an acessment of what you are getting wrong, you can come up with a mitigation plan to fix your bad behavior.

often it means realizing that what you see as needing work really can just be left alone.

like meddling in other people's lives, or trying to slur them with a tag so you can catalog and shame them, and cast your evil ideas upon them, writing a fake narrative about them, and dehumanizing someone who . . .well honestly, that you are just making up as you go along.

some of us understand that tendancy in an aspiring narration writer, and move on from it.

we recognize the falsity of fake narratives almost instantaneously.

and we then go on with debunking htem.

for example, if you know about a chappo named Susan Rice and how she lied, oh she lied, and she lied and pepole died, that Susan Rice.

well that chappo is one of those 'sneer of cold command' born-in-it pretended to be broke and poor (That is what they tell them as children to qualify for full boat welfare and free college).

Mila Kunis did a movie about it, a kind of red pill for them I suppose. They find out later that they are wealthy and 'highborn'.

that is perhaps a method to make them humble?

but someone like Susan still plays the bit of the 'poor minority angry marxist' with an attitude like it's always 'that time of the month' (a bad thing to say, but in that chaps case is that ever even true given what some say?)

anyway, so you make up crap about me, and it's totally false.

and I make up crap about Susan and it's probably close to the mark.

who is needing to modify their behavior?

>>10382319

are you telling me that I spilled it all over the table?

>>10382308

so you reveal that the 'john, luke, mathew my lips' from the other bread was a shill setting up a shill push of sick images of psyop victim girls?

the dung beetle admits it is a dung beetle and exposes it twisted methods and sick operational conditioning efforts like the picture of a . . . .

>>10382451

corporate globalism

corporate fuedalism

secret aristrocratic governance

order of the 'do what we say'

>>10382545

how do yo do that?

time marches on.

things have to change.

saddling the USPS with voting and then tieing their hands so they can't do changes needed to accomplish that voting is diabolical election tampering.

it all must be overturned.

The democrats better not keep it up, they have proven that they are not legitimate as trusty overseers and administrators.

>>10382654

the leg coverings of someone who is a kiss-ass?

>>10382658

I think it was a comment on the misspelling of 'sycophant' which uses the definition you show, but not that spelling.

>>10382675

anon, a sycophant can be a useful person if they adore you.

a psychopath never will be good to keep around.

while both are hard to take whne you can see what they are on about, the sycophant might actually end up realizing it and modify, and go to the love place, but the psychopath, by definition, can't ever do that.