>>10384299 lb
>Going by a NYPD insider who has posted here a few times in the last week, Barr's job is to keep the country and economy intact. If he can't get it right, Trump crashes the whole thing by revealing the Wiener laptop.
pic related
>>10384197 lb
campaign typo
@Em9nSch
"Adam, you’ve been saying this goes beyond party-line! Who would you thing might have been involved from repubs? Besides Romney and McCain!"
@adamhousley
"Someone needs to interview Jane Harman…as I have been saying…"
https://twitter.com/adamhousley/status/1297023366323306497
>@adamhousley
>"Someone needs to interview Jane Harman…
"You’re going to put your information about Wiener’s laptop Saturday or Sunday? While I want to know what’s on there … you better be hiding out like Snowden when you put it out there. You obviously have a bigger pair than most."
@adamhousley
"Nah it’s known by others. The info is generic. I’ll say it now. There was classified comms. Clinton Foundation info..some of it known, some of it not and not all above board. Huma and HRC comms. Also some stuff with Weiner and chats. That’s all I know."
"The specifics are known by those who saw it…I don’t have those. I have the overall. I’m told there was a ton on it. NYPD had it first. Then the FBI NY office. Then they gave it to FBI DC who held it. I’m told After weeks the NYPD and then the FBI NY office got “chirpy”."
"That forced the hand of the DC office who then had to tell Comey about it…that’s why he gave the October press conference when he did. He either didn’t know until then because it was being kept from him, or he had found out after the fact and also tried to keep it quiet."
https://twitter.com/adamhousley/status/1297023035430580230
Anons freaking out about goat humper Bennan's aide saying "Brennan is not a target of Durham" should ck out https://twitter.com/adamhousley feed, he made very good points that counter that narrative.
including this point he agreed with…
"If I'm Brennan & I know I'm a target of a criminal investigation I would do everything in my power to make people think I'm not so that when my indictment is unsealed I can claim political persecution, since Durham is unlikely to publicly confirm or deny my claim."
also said…
"Brennan and his people are pushing this narrative to try and get some in the media and others who may support him to believe Durham is political. Durham and the investigators are not. Brennan knows he’s in trouble."
>Wild Horses couldn't stop me from voting in November for Trump
POTUS flipping NY would be freaking epic!
>https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1297247565080133632
https://www.tweetvideodownloader.com/
You're doing it wrong! kek
>@adamhousley
>"Someone needs to interview Jane Harman…
2009
Major scandal erupts involving (D) Rep. Jane Harman, Alberto Gonzales and AIPAC
CQ reports that a key member of Congress was caught on wiretaps agreeing to intervene in a criminal prosecution of AIPAC officials, but Bush's AG protected her
Other obligations prevent me from writing until later today and I intend to focus on Rahm Emanuel's war-crimes-protecting proclamation that Obama's desire for immunity extends beyond CIA officers perpetrating torture to the "policy makers" who ordered it (watch today as the hardest-core Obama loyalists start explaining how the UN doesn't matter, international treaties are irrelevant, and war criminals need not be held accountable) but, until then, I wanted to highlight this extremely important and well-reported story from CQ's Jeff Stein, which involves allegations of major corruption and serious criminal activity on the part of Democratic Rep. Jane Harman. Here's one crucial prong of the story:
pic related
That's not even the most significant part. Back in October, 2006, Time reported that the DOJ and FBI were investigating whether Harman and AIPAC "violated the law in a scheme to get Harman reappointed as the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee" and "the probe also involves whether, in exchange for the help from AIPAC, Harman agreed to help try to persuade the Administration to go lighter on the AIPAC officials caught up in the ongoing investigation." So that part has been known since 2006.
Stein adds today that Harman was captured on an NSA wiretap conspiring with an Israeli agent to apply pressure on DOJ officials to scale back the AIPAC prosecution. But the real crux of Stein's scoop is that then-Attorney General Alberto Gonazles intervened to kill the criminal investigation into Harman even though DOJ lawyers had concluded that she committed crimes because top Bush officials wanted Harman's credibility to be preserved so that she could publicly defend the Bush administration's illegal warrantless eavesdropping program:
pic 2 related
Indeed, as I've noted many times, Jane Harman, in the wake of the NSA scandal, became probably the most crucial defender of the Bush warrantless eavesdropping program, using her status as "the ranking Democratic on the House intelligence committee" to repeatedly praise the NSA program as "essential to U.S. national security" and "both necessary and legal." She even went on Meet the Press to defend the program along with GOP Sen. Pat Roberts and Rep. Pete Hoekstra, and she even strongly suggested that the whistleblowers who exposed the lawbreaking and perhaps even the New York Times (but not Bush officials) should be criminally investigated, saying she "deplored the leak," that "it is tragic that a lot of our capability is now across the pages of the newspapers," and that the whistleblowers were "despicable." And Eric Lichtblau himself described how Harman, in 2004, attempted very aggressively to convince him not to write about the NSA program.
https://www.salon.com/2009/04/20/harman/
>We can now admit all the alleged John Brennan "PANIC" was wrong.
wrong
>Anons freaking out about goat humper Bennan's aide saying "Brennan is not a target of Durham" should ck out https://twitter.com/adamhousley feed
>John Brennan Was Put in a Perjury Trap Yesterday — A Completely Legitimate One
>https://www.redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/08/22/john-brennan-perjury-trap-yeserday-completely-legitimate-one/
BINGO
>Future proves past
>Not sure I quite get what that means yet
Here's an great example!
>Rapper Ice Cube Calls Out Democrats After Convention: 'What's in It for the Black Community?'
Besides shitty free housing in the slums, food stamps to get free shitty cokes and chips, shitty free 'healthcare', shitty free 'edumacation' in a shitty school, free abortions to keep the black community stagnant at a shitty 13-18% (while illegals outnumber you), and free cell phones so big brother can track yo asses….not much!
>It doesn’t matter how many people have their head stuck in the sand as long as a few good people will stand watch and protect them.
>not especially special eyes imo