>>1032326 (prev bread)

ok q,

now i want to know. it's not just me i'm sure.

i don't want to know what the proof is, that it was syria. i want to know what proof russia has that it was a singular faction associated so well with the uk that the uk acted it out, that potentially did skripal and then the latest chems in syria, and then i want to know what your god's honest analysis of their info is. this is what should now be demanded as burden of proof. for all the actions commensurate with starting a world-wide calamity ON OUR BEHALF, WE THE PEOPLE, such as what could be the resulting actions from an intervention of this nature towards a PROXY WAR set up for no other purpose, no other reason than to facilitate this juncture, this particular trigger point into the depths of horror. It's not enough to have 'one in the bag', NK fixed, then deduct a point. This is an operation for trust that you are delivering, for reality and TRUST and we need to have it, through dialogue if needs be - i know that this is where the PR folks subject to NAT SEC fit in but we will not survive on relationships one step removed. Find a way around this, or find a way to manage it. We still need this question answered, but we need it to be answered by you. DOiTQ.