Anonymous ID: a358f4 Aug. 22, 2020, 11:30 p.m. No.10389859   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0097

>>10389664

>We believe in the principle of Ubuntu, that the individual is inseparable from the community

 

Wow that's SO creepy! Sounds so much like "the Borg" in Star Trek. Demanding we all irreversibly "assimilate" into their control-matrix reality. shudder

 

We're all in separate bodies because that's how we're meant to experience life. We're born alone, and even if we're in a mass-murder event like 9-11, we nevertheless die alone. Our experiences in sum are ours alone, and we can be part of a group event yet come away with individual perceptions of that experience.

 

The claim to encumber individuals into a community which does not tolerate individuation is the death knell of societal evolution. Such a plan is destined to fail. If the victims/slaves of such a system truly cannot escape, as in Chinese communism, then suicides will escalate until the fabric of that totalitarian society unravels.

Anonymous ID: a358f4 Aug. 23, 2020, 12:11 a.m. No.10390053   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0106 >>0126

>>10389841

 

I'm not a fashion-wise person, but I have noticed that Pelosi is wearing scarves around her neck regularly as of late. Has anyone else noticed this and wondered why?

 

For fashion perspective, I've begun looking at women who seem to try to dress fashionably, and haven't seen others consistently wearing scarves around their necks.

 

Might the scarves be comms? Signals of some sort? Or maybe something as pedestrian as covering up scars from plastic surgery gone wrong.

Anonymous ID: a358f4 Aug. 23, 2020, 1:36 a.m. No.10390330   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0384

>>10390126

I think you missed my point. Yes, Pelosi "always" wears scarves lately, but hasn't always. A quick look back will "reveal" that she used to like to showcase her cleavage. Anons have commented on that herein. As for bikers, they wear neck gaters, not scarves.

Anonymous ID: a358f4 Aug. 23, 2020, 2:11 a.m. No.10390438   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10390255

Seems like more covering-up if the island wasn't preserved in the condition it was in at the time the indictment was unsealed and arrest made. It's EVIDENCE, and allowing anyone to alter the island is tampering with the evidence.