Anonymous ID: 87c563 Aug. 23, 2020, 7:28 a.m. No.10391750   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1765 >>1795 >>1798

This 911 footage claims to be 'never before released'. Go to around 11:30 timestamp to see the second impact. What's noticeable, to me at least, is the lack of the sound of a plane. The cameraman also fails to catch vision of the plane. Seems like we would have heard a plane if there was one.

I'd like to know what anons think. Is this really new footage? Why would it only get dropped now? Does it prove the 'no planes' theory?

 

Apologies for the FB video link and if this is old news.

 

https://www.facebook.com/fouad.jm/videos/10224412578802946/

Anonymous ID: 87c563 Aug. 23, 2020, 7:36 a.m. No.10391814   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10391795

> From memory, the cameraman was not looking at the second impact but his camera was on his friends who were looking at the second impact

Sounds like the same footage.

Good insight.

TYVM, anon

Anonymous ID: 87c563 Aug. 23, 2020, 7:52 a.m. No.10391918   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1924 >>1967

Catherine Herridge

@CBS_Herridge

#Durham At 8/19 hearing, Judge Boasberg referred to 10 page document with former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith’s signature. Section 10: Cooperation. Defendant’s Acceptance: “I am pleading guilty because I am in fact guilty of the offenses identified in this agreement.”

@CBSNews

 

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1297528931491487744