>Isn't that exactly what Greer does? And the best proof that ETs are real.
>The material Cooper disseminates just happens to align with Von Braun (a NAZI that would have remained a NAZI if the allies lost) and this also aligns with grier, which everyone has seen sauce and proof time and again hes friends with deep state.
> grier, which everyone has seen sauce and proof time and again hes friends with deep state.
grierfag trying to distance himself from the bakes for optics now eh
he's on the run from last thread. baker hogging all the dough and pretending to be on a secret mission for more ET contact so people come to suck his cock for stories about sightings. just trying to distance himself from the breads for optics.
go back and read all the breads, you'll get your fill.
>ce5anon baker
I got a funny feeling if anons go back and read previous breads they'll see him using these memes trying to piss people off and have them explain over and over why this guide is a psyop and all the suggestions should actually be avoided not adhered to. How many times is this edgelord faggot going to pull this?
Spiritual Gaslighting;
Read all about it. Since it's employed here regularly anons may choose to familiarize themselves with how disinfo agents use spirituality to gaslight others, extract reactions, but also to sell their narratives.
https://www.elephantjournal.com/2019/11/spiritual-gaslighting-the-unhealthy-inauthentic-practice-sarah-norrad/
https://thriveglobal.com/stories/spiritual-gaslighting/
https://kellybramblett.com/blog/f/understanding-spiritual-gaslighting
http://owenweddle.com/beware-of-spiritual-gaslighting-and-judgment/
https://www.kenzieeason.com/written-blog/2018/8/29/spiritual-gaslighting-what-it-is-and-how-to-recognize-it
https://www.wemystic.com/spiritual-gaslighting/
… The more you know.
>You are doing CE-5
Isn't that just what a deep state clown calls it when really it shouldn't be marketed and branded because people have done it for thousands of years without attaching deep state trademarks or slogans to it while subliminally selling other information along side it because it works?
Isn't CE-5 in and of itself rife with underlying false concepts being incorporated into the contact matrix so people associate their positive contact with the lies of the inventor of CE-5? The Rockefeller Initiative clowns?
>Be very careful
Be very careful of what? Anons figuring out it's the same individual using dynamic IP's that keep resetting and each time they post and they are trying to spark a negative reaction or trying to waste anons time by explaining all the same psyops over and over again?
Funny how the spiritual gaslighter also happens to be the one poking around for a reaction with CE-5.The fact you keep using the same strategies and the same baited discussions over and over with new IP's that reset after the same period of time only puts more focus on you and differentiates you from other anons. It makes you far easier to detect out of the crowd when you use the same attempts to annoy in literally every bread.
This is why grierfag et al has tried so goddamn hard in previous breads to stop anons from discussing even the possibility of evil extraterrestrials.
THEY WANT YOU ASLEEP.
Remember Q said movies are made to glorify past TRUE events.
>We
We can make up our own mind without you needing to speak for WE THE PEOPLE. I will talk about the economic system created by negative extraterrestrials and make myself conscious of their plans. I will talk about darkness and evil and about lies as well. I will discuss all that there is, not only half of the story. I will find all that is truth and all that is lies and everything in between. I do not need you to speak for me (we).
I will laugh at how quickly a reply appears when suggesting that pleiadians could potentially be evil and that the mainstream narrative we are fed may not be entirely accurate. Always interesting to see how quickly "anons" react to certain parts of the narrative being questioned. Almost like people are sitting here on this thread all day waiting to reply. Thanks for adding a bunch of questionable info to help gain our trust that you know what you are talking about! No one should discuss the bearers of false gifts and broken promises and who that might be. Only focus on good. Ignore evil.
Someone is being controlled because they raised extremely valid points and now you're labeling them with a projection that they are controlled? You can't even dispute the evidence and sauce presented so you resort to labeling? If anything you're displaying a very clear intention of getting anons to believe the 1977 interruption and calling anons controlled if they present facts that disprove it. Well thanks for sharing agendafag. Glad to know everyone here is controlled if they don't agree with you or present facts that contradict your narrative. Instead of screaming for anons to "tone it down" why don't you present some actual evidence to counter? You know, isn't that what these discussions are all about? Facts?
Facts prove otherwise. Crop circle cannot be easily disputed while the 1977 interruption can be easily disputed and disproved with multiple concrete facts. Here's another point for the brainlets, the entire ashtar sheeran psyop is derived entirely from this 1977 interruption. Without that the entire facade would not exist.You are attempting to group disinfo in with truths, which is always the case here.
>Only shills will attempt to stir drama
No drama. Facts are stated and you are unable to provide a counter so you call it drama in an attempt to persuade others reading that the television interruption is a genuine extraterrestrial message when it was actually a local ET cult using a rudimentary means to hijack a signal. Or nah it's real, the aliens just happened to develop an english accent.
>attempt to include famefags, etc.
Show an example of anyone doing that here? You are making things up. The fact you are displaying these tendencies to force a group think consensus while using ad hominem attacks and failing to provide factual evidence to support your claims is showing an ulterior motive behind your messages. I think it's important for anons to recognize what you are trying to sell here while providing no proof or evidence to back it up.
>You can also make the argument that a few bored guys with lawnmowers made the supposed crop circle, which obviously didn't happen. I won't converse with you anymore
Please read >>10593215
This is why the crop circle has veracity
Now read >>10601091
This is why the ashtar interruption does not have veracity.
Read.
Learn the difference between facts and convenient assumptions.
You have displayed an incredible amount of effort to sway anons to believe the ashtar message with playground level psychology while simultaneously providing zero evidence to support your beliefs which you are desperate for other anons to believe. You've made it very apparent that you believe what you are saying without having a shred of evidence to prove it. You've also made it very apparent you are trying to sell a specific narrative tagged on with something completely and utterly unrelated (crop circles) to your tv interruption. You are now pouting that you lack a retort with sauce.
You are the same shill posting these memes phishing for a reaction at TL right as we speak.
The same shill posting those colorful memes in every bread trying to get anons to react or explain why it's a psyop over and over again.
Anons can read for themselves.
>You do realize how incredibly obvious you just made it that both of these posts are you? Five minutes apart? Really?
>You even end your last sentence with an exclamation in each post! How sloppy.
kek
No one's ever disputed good ET's here, at least the genuine anons.
You however have had a ruthless campaign attempting to psychologically program anons to ignore all information relating to the bad ones.
Look here, not there.
>Someone mentions info relating to negative ET's controlling our planet.
>Someone mentions info relating to sketchy bakers controlling the narrative and info here.
>Grierfag projects that positive ET contact is being attacked and suppressed.
>Grierfag repeats this tactic every thread.
anons can decide whether or not they want to participate in positive ET contact however you shoving it down people's throats makes your motives highly questionable
>Wait until you realize how deep Q's connections to good ETs are.
Why do you state this like you absolutely KNOW FOR SURE what you're talking about?
What do you KNOW that the rest of us don't?
Are you top secret security clearance? Q clearance?
Let me guess, Q is the pleiadian incarnated soul of JFK QIRTQ right? Kabamur psyop material?
Why do you always have an air of seeming to state your absolute assurance on a topic that can't be proven and why do you always have an air of authority when doing so?
you don't know what you're talking about for certain, but you definitely try to make it appear so.