I'm basically thinking out loud here about how pitch the idea of the "global cabal" to normies. I'm thinking there are three basic strategies and I'll explain which one I think works best and why:
First, maybe think about them as a global group of Satanic pedophiles. This is the description that the fake news media has chosen in describing "the Q conspiracy" and I think that ought to be a tell that THEY think it best for them. It is just too nutty on the surface. Moreover, most of the hard claims here are very poorly sourced. I don't doubt that there are overt Satanists and that some abuse children, but I have little evidence on such things, and even if Q team were to release such evidence, the enemy would claim it is fake even if it isn't.
Second, maybe think about the global cabal as the financial elite that effectively controls all international finance and is able to create money for itself, and hence keep power. I think this is a better way of pitching things for some educated types, and I don't doubt that there is hard evidence that could be released (and will be in trials). But there are two downsides here: one is that most people do not understand the details of high finance (since it is pretty boring if you have no money, and if you do, then you often get "bought in"). But also, the enemy has tried to innoculate itself against this with persistent claims of "anti-Semitism" - the very idea of a global financial elite has been associated in the minds of mind with the idea of "buried irrational hatreds" that could burst into mass murder if we even discuss them. No doubt many here "get" how they do this, but will normies? Maybe eventually, but maybe there is another option.
Third, and I think this works best (since it plays to traditional "leftist" sympathies): the global elite are those who control the mega-corporations that, blinded by greed, run roughshod over millions and bilions throughout the world, often in VERY CONCRETE ways. Think of the film AVATAR, for instance. It looked nice, but it was somewhat forgettable, mainly because the plot was just a filling in of a standard leftist trope. And yet that basic leftist trope isn't actually wrong (even if it is far from the whole truth). There really ARE mega-corporations run by little greedy men, and they really do conspire to FUCK innocent people if that is what is needed to keep the wealth. And while they certainly do it within the US (but in more subtle ways), they do it even MORE overtly in third world countries (or whatever leftists call them now). They much more blatantly foster murder, disease, pollution and all such things. And people like the Clintons KNOW THIS and assist them.
While there are other strategic reasons for THEM to cast their lots with the idea that DJT is "racist" (despite all evidence pointing to him being the least "racist" president in recent history), the MAIN reason (little discussed) is to disguise the fact that the global cabal BRUTALIZES people in the "third world" in order to extract profit. And so the global cabal, via their allies in the D party, seeks to divert the blame for this to the "hidden racism" of white Americans. And the Clintons and Obamas and Podestas and others of their ilk know perfectly well what is going on.
In any case, that is why I think the third option might be best when it comes to SMASHING the narrative that has been promoted by the fake news media.